Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting escitalopram treatment response from pre-treatment and early response resting state fMRI in a multi-site sample: A CAN-BIND-1 report.
Harris, Jacqueline K; Hassel, Stefanie; Davis, Andrew D; Zamyadi, Mojdeh; Arnott, Stephen R; Milev, Roumen; Lam, Raymond W; Frey, Benicio N; Hall, Geoffrey B; Müller, Daniel J; Rotzinger, Susan; Kennedy, Sidney H; Strother, Stephen C; MacQueen, Glenda M; Greiner, Russell.
Affiliation
  • Harris JK; Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: jkh@ualberta.ca.
  • Hassel S; Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Davis AD; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Zamyadi M; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Arnott SR; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Milev R; Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Queen's University, and Providence Care, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Lam RW; Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Frey BN; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Mood Disorders Program and Women's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hall GB; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Müller DJ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Me
  • Rotzinger S; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kennedy SH; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Strother SC; Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • MacQueen GM; Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research and Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Greiner R; Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neuroimage Clin ; 35: 103120, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35908308
ABSTRACT
Many previous intervention studies have used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to predict the antidepressant response of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD); however, practical constraints have limited many of those attempts to small, single centre studies which may not adequately reflect how these models will generalize when used in clinical practice. Not only does the act of collecting data at multiple sites generally increase sample sizes (a critical point in machine learning development) it also generates a more heterogeneous dataset due to systematic differences in scanners at different sites, and geographical differences in patient populations. As part of the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND-1) study, 144 MDD patients from six sites underwent resting state fMRI prior to starting escitalopram treatment, and again two weeks after the start. Here, we consider ways to use machine learning techniques to produce models that can predict response (measured at eight weeks after initiation), based on various parcellations, functional connectivity (FC) metrics, dimensionality reduction algorithms, and base learners, and also whether to use scans from one or both time points. Models that use only baseline (pre-treatment) or only week 2 (early-response) whole-brain FC features consistently failed to perform significantly better than default models. Utilizing the change in FC between these two time points, however, yielded significant results, with the best performing analytical pipeline achieving 69.6% (SD 10.8) accuracy. These results appear contrary to findings from many smaller single-site studies, which report substantially higher predictive accuracies from models trained on only baseline resting state FC features, suggesting these models may not generalize well beyond data used for development. Further, these results indicate the potential value of collecting data both before and shortly after treatment initiation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Depressive Disorder, Major Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Neuroimage Clin Year: 2022 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Depressive Disorder, Major Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Neuroimage Clin Year: 2022 Type: Article