Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electron ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation study using a clinical linac: Linac modification, dosimetry, and radiobiological outcome.
Xie, De-Huan; Li, Yi-Chuan; Ma, Sai; Yang, Xin; Lan, Ruo-Ming; Chen, Ao-Qiang; Zhu, Hong-Yu; Mei, Yan; Peng, Li-Xia; Li, Zuo-Feng; Huang, Bi-Jun; Chen, Yan; Huang, Xiao-Yan; Qian, Chao-Nan.
Affiliation
  • Xie DH; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li YC; Elekta Instrument Ltd. Beijing Branch, Shanghai, China.
  • Ma S; Elekta Instrument Ltd. Beijing Branch, Shanghai, China.
  • Yang X; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Lan RM; School of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China.
  • Chen AQ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhu HY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Mei Y; Department of Pathology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
  • Peng LX; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Li ZF; Guangzhou Concord Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Huang BJ; Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen Y; Elekta Instrument Ltd. Beijing Branch, Shanghai, China.
  • Huang XY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
  • Qian CN; Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Med Phys ; 49(10): 6728-6738, 2022 Oct.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959736
PURPOSE: Ultra-high dose rate FLASH irradiation (FLASH-IR) has been shown to cause less normal tissue damage compared with conventional irradiation (CONV-IR), this is known as the "FLASH effect." It has attracted immense research interest because its underlying mechanism is scarcely known. The purpose of this study was to determine whether FLASH-IR and CONV-IR induce differential inflammatory cytokine expression using a modified clinical linac. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Elekta Synergy linac was used to deliver 6 MeV CONV-IR and modified to deliver FLASH-IR. Female FvB mice were randomly assigned to three different groups: a non-irradiated control, CONV-IR, or FLASH-IR. The FLASH-IR beam was produced by single pulses repeated manually with a 20-s interval (Strategy 1), or single-trigger multiple pulses with a 10 ms interval (Strategy 2). Mice were immobilized in the prone position in a custom-designed applicator with Gafchromic films positioned under the body. The prescribed doses for the mice were 6 to 18 Gy and verified using Gafchromic films. Cytokine expression of three pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interferon-γ [IFN-γ], interleukin-6 [IL-6]) and one anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10) in serum samples and skin tissue were examined within 1 month post-IR. RESULTS: The modified linac delivered radiation at an intra-pulse dose rate of around 1 × 106 Gy/s and a dose per pulse over 2 Gy at a source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 13 to 15 cm. The achieved dose coverage was 90%-105% of the maximum dose within -20 to 20 mm in the X direction and 95% within -30 to 30 mm in the Y direction. The absolute deviations between the prescribed dose and the actual dose were 2.21%, 6.04%, 2.09%, and 2.73% for 6, 9, 12, and 15 Gy as measured by EBT3 films, respectively; and 4.00%, 4.49%, and 2.30% for 10, 14, and 18 Gy as measured by the EBT XD films, respectively. The reductions in the CONV-IR versus the FLASH-IR group were 4.89%, 10.28%, -7.8%, and -22.17% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the serum on D6, respectively; 37.26%, 67.16%, 56.68%, and -18.95% in the serum on D31, respectively; and 62.67%, 35.65%, 37.75%, and -12.20% for TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-10 in the skin tissue, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-high dose rate electron FLASH caused lower pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in serum and skin tissue which might mediate differential tissue damage between FLASH-IR and CONV-IR.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / Interleukin-10 Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha / Interleukin-10 Limits: Animals Language: En Journal: Med Phys Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: China