Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pre-Sleep Cognitive Arousal Is Unrelated to Sleep Misperception in Healthy Sleepers When Unexpected Sounds Are Played during Non-Rapid Eye Movement Sleep: A Polysomnography Study.
Sharman, Rachel L; Bastien, Célyne H; Perlis, Michael L; Wetherell, Mark A; Barclay, Nicola L; Santhi, Nayantara; Ellis, Jason G; Elder, Greg J.
Affiliation
  • Sharman RL; Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
  • Bastien CH; École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
  • Perlis ML; Centre de Recherche CERVO, Québec, QC G1E 1T2, Canada.
  • Wetherell MA; Behavioral Sleep Medicine Program, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Barclay NL; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
  • Santhi N; Sleep Universal Ltd., Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
  • Ellis JG; Northumbria Sleep Research, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
  • Elder GJ; Northumbria Sleep Research, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK.
Brain Sci ; 12(9)2022 Sep 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36138955
BACKGROUND: It is well-established that environmental noise can disrupt sleep, and cause a mismatch between subjective and objective sleep, which is known as "sleep misperception". Naturalistic studies indicate that pre-sleep cognitive arousal and sleep misperception are associated in the context of noise. However, it is not known if this is the case when ecologically valid noises are specifically played during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, which is susceptible to noise-related disruption. The present study evaluated if pre-sleep cognitive arousal was associated with sleep misperception in healthy normal sleepers, when unexpected ecologically valid common nocturnal noises were played during NREM sleep. METHODS: Eighteen healthy sleepers (Mage = 23.37 years, SDage = 3.21 years) participated. Sleep was measured objectively on three consecutive nights using polysomnography, in a sleep laboratory environment, and subjectively, through participant estimates of total sleep time (TST). Night 1 was a baseline night where no noises were played. On Night 2, noises, which were chosen to be representative of habitual nocturnal noises heard in home environments, were played to participants via in-ear headphones after 5 min of objective sleep. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, habitual pre-sleep cognitive arousal was not associated with subjective-objective TST discrepancy on Night 2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in healthy sleepers, when ecologically valid noises are played unexpectedly during NREM sleep in an unfamiliar sleep laboratory environment the subjective experience of sleep is not associated with pre-sleep cognitive arousal, or negatively impacted by noise exposure.
Key words