Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Algorithmic transparency and interpretability measures improve radiologists' performance in BI-RADS 4 classification.
Jungmann, Friederike; Ziegelmayer, Sebastian; Lohoefer, Fabian K; Metz, Stephan; Müller-Leisse, Christina; Englmaier, Maximilian; Makowski, Marcus R; Kaissis, Georgios A; Braren, Rickmer F.
Affiliation
  • Jungmann F; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Ziegelmayer S; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Lohoefer FK; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Metz S; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Müller-Leisse C; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Englmaier M; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Makowski MR; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Kaissis GA; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  • Braren RF; Department of Computing, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Eur Radiol ; 33(3): 1844-1851, 2023 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36282311
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the perception of different types of AI-based assistance and the interaction of radiologists with the algorithm's predictions and certainty measures.

METHODS:

In this retrospective observer study, four radiologists were asked to classify Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 (BI-RADS4) lesions (n = 101 benign, n = 99 malignant). The effect of different types of AI-based assistance (occlusion-based interpretability map, classification, and certainty) on the radiologists' performance (sensitivity, specificity, questionnaire) were measured. The influence of the Big Five personality traits was analyzed using the Pearson correlation.

RESULTS:

Diagnostic accuracy was significantly improved by AI-based assistance (an increase of 2.8% ± 2.3%, 95 %-CI 1.5 to 4.0 %, p = 0.045) and trust in the algorithm was generated primarily by the certainty of the prediction (100% of participants). Different human-AI interactions were observed ranging from nearly no interaction to humanization of the algorithm. High scores in neuroticism were correlated with higher persuasibility (Pearson's r = 0.98, p = 0.02), while higher consciousness and change of accuracy showed an inverse correlation (Pearson's r = -0.96, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

Trust in the algorithm's performance was mostly dependent on the certainty of the predictions in combination with a plausible heatmap. Human-AI interaction varied widely and was influenced by personality traits. KEY POINTS • AI-based assistance significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists in classifying BI-RADS 4 mammography lesions. • Trust in the algorithm's performance was mostly dependent on the certainty of the prediction in combination with a reasonable heatmap. • Personality traits seem to influence human-AI collaboration. Radiologists with specific personality traits were more likely to change their classification according to the algorithm's prediction than others.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vascular Diseases / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vascular Diseases / Breast Neoplasms Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur Radiol Journal subject: RADIOLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany