Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fast quantitative bone marrow lesion measurement on knee MRI for the assessment of osteoarthritis.
Preiswerk, Frank; Sury, Meera S; Wortman, Jeremy R; Neumann, Gesa; Wells, William; Duryea, Jeffrey.
Affiliation
  • Preiswerk F; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Sury MS; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Wortman JR; Department of Radiology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
  • Neumann G; Department of Radiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
  • Wells W; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
  • Duryea J; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open ; 4(1): 100234, 2022 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36474467
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a prevalent disease with a high economic and social cost. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to visualize many KOA-related structures including bone marrow lesions (BMLs), which are associated with OA pain. Several semi-automated software methods have been developed to segment BMLs, using manual, labor-intensive methods, which can be costly for large clinical trials and other studies of KOA. The goal of our study was to develop and validate a more efficient method to quantify BML volume on knee MRI scans. Materials and

methods:

We have applied a deep learning approach using a patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) which was trained using 673 MRI data sets and the segmented BML masks obtained from a trained reader. Given the location of a BML provided by the reader, the network performed a fully automated segmentation of the BML, removing the need for tedious manual delineation. Accuracy was quantified using the Pearson's correlation coefficient, by a comparison to a second expert reader, and using the Dice Similarity Score (DSC).

Results:

The Pearson's R2 value was 0.94 and we found similar agreement when comparing two readers (R2 â€‹= â€‹0.85) and each reader versus the DL model (R2 â€‹= â€‹0.95 and R2 â€‹= â€‹0.81). The average DSC was 0.70.

Conclusions:

We developed and validated a deep learning-based method to segment BMLs on knee MRI data sets. This has the potential to be a valuable tool for future large studies of KOA.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Osteoarthr Cartil Open Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Osteoarthr Cartil Open Year: 2022 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States