Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Multiple Myeloma with Translocation (4;14): The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

ABSTRACT

Translocation between chromosomes 4 and 14, t(4;14), has been reported in 15% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is considered a high-risk cytogenetic abnormality associated with inferior outcomes. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is standard of care for patients with high-risk MM, yet there are scarce data on post-transplantation outcomes of patients with t(4;14) MM. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of MM patients with t(4;14) who underwent auto-HCT and received contemporary anti-myeloma agents for induction and post-transplantation maintenance. We conducted a retrospective analysis of MM patients with t(4;14), detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), who underwent auto-HCT between 2008 and 2018 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were hematologic response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status after auto-HCT. MRD status in the bone marrow biopsy was evaluated using 8-color next-generation flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 1/10-5 cells. Seventy-nine patients were included (52% male), with a median age of 60 years (range, 32 to 78 years). Forty-four patients (56%) had an additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormality. Fifty patients (63%) achieved at least a very good partial response (≥VGPR) prior to auto-HCT and 20 (25%) had MRD-negative ≥VGPR. At the best post-transplantation evaluation, 90% had ≥VGPR and 63% had MRD-negative ≥VGPR. The median follow-up for survivors was 35.7 months (range, 7.7 to 111.6 months). For the entire cohort, median PFS and OS were 22.9 months and 60.4 months, respectively. Patients with MRD-negative ≥VGPR prior to transplantation had improved PFS and OS on both univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) (hazard ratio [HR], .35 [95% confidence interval (CI), .16 to .76; P = .008] and .12 [95% CI, .03 to .44; P = .002], respectively). The presence of additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities was not associated with inferior PFS (P = .57) or OS (P = .70). Post-transplantation lenalidomide-based combinations were associated with improved OS in both UVA and MVA (HR, .14; 95% CI, .04 to .45; P = .001), while their impact on PFS was not statistically significant (P = .37). Our results consolidate t(4;14) as a high-risk abnormality associated with poor outcomes despite novel agent induction, auto-HCT, and post-transplantation maintenance. Despite some inherent study design limitations, including a relatively small cohort and heterogeneity in treatment, we observed that deeper pretransplantation response and post-transplantation maintenance with lenalidomide-based combination were associated with improved outcomes. Novel immune and cellular therapies are needed to improve the outcomes in patients with t(4;14).