Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality management, quality assurance, and quality control in medical physics.
Amurao, Max; Gress, Dustin A; Keenan, Mary Ann; Halvorsen, Per H; Nye, Jonathon A; Mahesh, Mahadevappa.
Affiliation
  • Amurao M; Department of Radiation Safety, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Gress DA; Department of Quality and Safety, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia, USA.
  • Keenan MA; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Halvorsen PH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Nye JA; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Mahesh M; Department of Radiology and Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(3): e13885, 2023 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36659841
The historic and ongoing evolution of the practice, technology, terminology, and implementation of programs related to quality in the medical radiological professions has given rise to the interchangeable use of the terms Quality Management (QM), Quality Assurance (QA), and Quality Control (QC) in the vernacular. This White Paper aims to provide clarification of QM, QA, and QC in medical physics context and guidance on how to use these terms appropriately in American College of Radiology (ACR) Practice Parameters and Technical Standards, generalizable to other guidance initiatives. The clarification of these nuanced terms in the radiology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine environments will not only boost the comprehensibility and usability of the Medical Physics Technical Standards and Practice Parameters, but also provide clarity and a foundation for ACR's clinical, physician-led Practice Parameters, which also use these important terms for monitoring equipment performance for safety and quality. Further, this will support the ongoing development of the professional practice of clinical medical physics by providing a common framework that distinguishes the various types of responsibilities borne by medical physicists and others in the medical radiological environment. Examples are provided of how QM, QA, and QC may be applied in the context of ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation Oncology / Nuclear Medicine Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Journal subject: BIOFISICA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiation Oncology / Nuclear Medicine Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Journal subject: BIOFISICA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States