Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of two different starting dose of rhFSH in GnRH antagonist protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve.
Jia, Zhi-Cheng; Li, Yong-Qian; Li, Ran; Hou, Sen; Xia, Qing-Chang; Yang, Kai; Wang, Pei-Xuan; Li, Shu-Miao; Sun, Zhen-Gao; Guo, Ying.
Affiliation
  • Jia ZC; The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Li YQ; College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Li R; College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Hou S; Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Xia QC; The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Yang K; College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Wang PX; The First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Li SM; The Second Clinical College, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
  • Sun ZG; Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
  • Guo Y; College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1068141, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36742378
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate different starting doses of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH) on pregnancy outcomes for patients with normal ovarian reserve during gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol-controlled ovarian stimulation of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, a total of 1138 patients undergoing IVF cycles following the GnRH-ant protocol were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups according to the starting dose of rhFSH. 617 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU, and 521 patients received a starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU. We compared demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation and embryological characteristics, and pregnancy and birth outcomes between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the possible effects of the known potential confounding factors on pregnancy outcomes.

Results:

The number of oocytes retrieved in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly lower than those in the 225 IU rhFSH group. There was no significant difference between the two groups referring to embryological characteristics. The proportion of fresh embryo transfer in the 150 IU rhFSH group was significantly higher than that in the 225 IU rhFSH group (48.30% vs. 40.90%), and there was no difference in the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU for ovarian stimulation has a similar pregnancy outcome as starting dose of rhFSH of 225 IU in GnRH-ant protocol for patients with normal ovarian reserve. Considering the potential cost-effectiveness and shorter time to live birth, the starting dose of rhFSH of 150 IU may be more suitable than 225 IU.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Reserve / Follicle Stimulating Hormone Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ovarian Reserve / Follicle Stimulating Hormone Type of study: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: China