Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the accuracy of established patient inspiratory effort estimation methods during mechanical support ventilation.
van Diepen, A; Bakkes, T H G F; De Bie, A J R; Turco, S; Bouwman, R A; Woerlee, P H; Mischi, M.
Affiliation
  • van Diepen A; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, 5612AZ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • Bakkes THGF; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, 5612AZ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • De Bie AJR; Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • Turco S; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, 5612AZ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • Bouwman RA; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, 5612AZ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • Woerlee PH; Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
  • Mischi M; Department of Electrical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, De Zaale, Eindhoven, 5612AZ, Noord-Brabant, the Netherlands.
Heliyon ; 9(2): e13610, 2023 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852019
There is a clinical need for monitoring inspiratory effort to prevent lung- and diaphragm injury in patients who receive supportive mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit. Different pressure-based techniques are available to estimate this inspiratory effort at the bedside, but the accuracy of their effort estimation is uncertain since they are all based on a simplified linear model of the respiratory system, which omits gas compressibility of air, and the viscoelasticity and nonlinearities of the respiratory system. The aim of this in-silico study was to provide an overview of the pressure-based estimation techniques and to evaluate their accuracy using a more sophisticated model of the respiratory system and ventilator. The influence of the following parameters on the accuracy of the pressure-based estimation techniques was evaluated using the in-silico model: 1) the patient's respiratory mechanics 2) PEEP and the inspiratory pressure of the ventilator 3) gas compressibility of air 4) viscoelasticity of the respiratory system 5) the strength of the inspiratory effort. The best-performing technique in terms of accuracy was the whole breath occlusion. The average error and maximum error were the lowest for all patient archetypes. We found that the error was related to the expansion of gas in the breathing set and lungs and respiratory compliance. However, concerns exist that other factors not included in the model, such as a changed muscle-force relation during an occlusion, might influence the true accuracy. The estimation techniques based on the esophageal pressure showed an error related to the viscoelastic element in the model which leads to a higher error than the occlusion. The error of the esophageal pressure-based techniques is therefore highly dependent on the pathology of the patient and the settings of the ventilator and might change over time while a patient recovers or becomes more ill.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Heliyon Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Heliyon Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands