Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clusters of healthcare-associated SARS-CoV-2 infections in Norwegian hospitals detected by a fully automatic register-based surveillance system.
Skagseth, H; Danielsen, A S; Kacelnik, O; Trondsen, U J; Berg, T C; Sorknes, N K; Eriksen-Volle, H-M.
Affiliation
  • Skagseth H; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Danielsen AS; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Microbiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
  • Kacelnik O; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Trondsen UJ; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Berg TC; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Sorknes NK; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
  • Eriksen-Volle HM; Department of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: hanne-merete.eriksen-volle@fhi.no.
J Hosp Infect ; 135: 50-54, 2023 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36913981
BACKGROUND: Notifications to the Norwegian Institute of Public Health of outbreaks in Norwegian healthcare institutions are mandatory by law, but under-reporting is suspected due to failure to identify clusters, or because of human or system-based factors. This study aimed to establish and describe a fully automatic, register-based surveillance system to identify clusters of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals and compare these with outbreaks notified through the mandated outbreak system Vesuv. METHODS: We used linked data from the emergency preparedness register Beredt C19, based on the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases. We tested two different algorithms for HAI clusters, described their size and compared them with outbreaks notified through Vesuv. RESULTS: A total of 5033 patients were registered with an indeterminate, probable, or definite HAI. Depending on the algorithm, our system detected 44 or 36 of the 56 officially notified outbreaks. Both algorithms detected more clusters then officially reported (301 and 206, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to use existing data sources to establish a fully automatic surveillance system identifying clusters of SARS-CoV-2. Automatic surveillance can improve preparedness through earlier identification of clusters of HAIs, and by lowering the workloads of infection control specialists in hospitals.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cross Infection / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Norway

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cross Infection / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: J Hosp Infect Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Norway