Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in triple negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Elmakaty, Ibrahim; Abdo, Ruba; Elsabagh, Ahmed; Elsayed, Abdelrahman; Malki, Mohammed Imad.
Affiliation
  • Elmakaty I; College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar.
  • Abdo R; College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar.
  • Elsabagh A; College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar.
  • Elsayed A; College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, P. O. Box: 2713, Doha, Qatar.
  • Malki MI; Pathology Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. momalki@qu.edu.qa.
Cancer Cell Int ; 23(1): 90, 2023 May 11.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37170090
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) is a lethal subtype of breast cancer with limited treatment options. The purpose of this Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) is to compare the efficacy and safety of inhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in treating TNBC.

METHODS:

Our search strategy was used in six databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature database, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 2nd, 2022, as well as a thorough search in the most used trial registries. We included phase II and III randomized controlled trials that looked at the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of TNBC and reported either Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), or pathological Complete Response (pCR). The risk of bias was assessed utilizing Cochrane's risk of bias 2 tool, and the statistical analysis was performed using a frequentist contrast-based method for NMA by employing standard pairwise meta-analysis applying random effects model.

RESULTS:

12 trials (5324 patients) were included in our NMA including seven phase III trials. Pembrolizumab in a neoadjuvant setting achieved a pooled OS of 0.82 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.03), a PFS of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.94) and a pCR 2.79 (95% CI 1.07 to 7.24) compared to Atezolizumab's OS of 0.92 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.15), PFS of 0.82 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), and pCR of 1.94 (95% CI 0.86 to 4.37). Atezolizumab had less grade ≥ 3 adverse events (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.42) than Pembrolizumab (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.33) in the neoadjuvant setting.

CONCLUSIONS:

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibited varying efficacy in terms of OS, PFS, and pCR. They were associated with an increase in immune-related adverse effects. When used early in the course of TNBC, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors exert their maximum benefit. Durvalumab as a maintenance treatment instead of chemotherapy has shown promising outcomes. Future studies should focus on PD-L1 expression status and TNBC subtypes, since these factors may contribute to the design of individualized TNBC therapy regimens. Systematic review registration PROSPERO Identifier CRD42022380712.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Cancer Cell Int Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Qatar

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Cancer Cell Int Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Qatar