Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of modified endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for superficial esophageal circumferential lesions.
Tian, Ye; Xue, Chengjun; Li, Xiaomin; Bai, Jianan; Xiao, Zequan; He, Qibin; Kan, Jingbao; Zhu, Guoqin; Tang, Qiyun.
Affiliation
  • Tian Y; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
  • Xue C; Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangsu Jianhu People's Hospital, Yancheng 224700, China.
  • Li X; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
  • Bai J; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
  • Xiao Z; Department of Gastroenterology, The Friendship Hospital of Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture, Ili State 835000, China.
  • He Q; Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China.
  • Kan J; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
  • Zhu G; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
  • Tang Q; Department of Geriatric Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Dis Esophagus ; 36(11)2023 Oct 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37279447
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-tunnel dissection using hemostatic forceps and needle-type device for patients with esophageal circumferential lesions (ECLs). Patients with ECLs were enrolled in the study and underwent endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) or hemostatic forceps-based ESTD (ESFTD). All patients were divided into three subgroups according to longitudinal length of the lesions (LLLs): >8 cm, 4-8 cm and < 4 cm. The clinical data such as gender, age, length of lesions and operating time were collected. A total of 152 patients were included in this study and comprised 80 cases of ESFTD and 72 cases of ESTD. The procedure time was markedly shorter in the ESFTD group than in the ESTD group (P < 0.001). Moreover, ESFTD significantly increased the rate of complete resection and reduced specimen injury in LLLs >8 cm and 4-8 cm subgroup compared with ESTD (P < 0.001), but not in <4 cm subgroup (P > 0.05). The perforation and infection rate were similar in ESFTD and ESTD group (P > 0.05). However, ESFTD effectively decreased the muscular injury rate' the duration of chest pain and the time from endoscopic surgery to first occurrence of esophageal stenosis compared with ESTD group (P < 0.01). ESFTD has better efficacy and safety than ESTD in the treatment of ECLs, especially for large lesions. ESFTD could be recommended for patients with ECLs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Hemostatics / Esophageal Stenosis / Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Dis Esophagus Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Hemostatics / Esophageal Stenosis / Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Dis Esophagus Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: China