Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of making skin incision with electrocautery on positive Cutibacterium acnes culture rates in shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Kim, H Mike; Huff, Haley; Smith, Matthew J; Nguyen, Michael; Smith, Conor.
Affiliation
  • Kim HM; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. Electronic address: hmikekim9@gmail.com.
  • Huff H; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Smith MJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Nguyen M; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Smith C; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(1): 6-13, 2024 Jan.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579940
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cutibacterium acnes remains the most commonly detected organism in shoulder arthroplasty. C acnes infection is thought to occur during shoulder arthroplasty through contamination of the surgical field with C acnes from the incised dermis. The purpose of this study was to examine whether using electrocautery for making skin incisions would decrease C acnes culture rates at the incised dermis compared to using scalpels during shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were randomized into 2 groups, electrocautery vs. scalpel incision group. All patients received a standard preoperative antiseptic preparation including chlorhexidine gluconate showers, intravenous antibiotic administration, and topical application of hydrogen peroxide, povidone iodine, isopropyl alcohol, and DuraPrep. Cultures were obtained from the incised dermal edge immediately after skin incision and later from surgeon's gloves and forceps immediately prior to humeral component implantation. The primary outcome was positive C acnes culture rates compared between the groups.

RESULTS:

A total of 64 patients (32 in each group) were enrolled. There were 24 males in each group. Regarding dermis cultures, 10 patients (31%) in the scalpel group were positive with 8 of them positive for C acnes, whereas no patients in the electrocautery group were positive (P < .001). Regarding glove cultures, the electrocautery group had 8 patients positive C acnes, while the scalpel group had 8 (P = .777). Regarding forceps cultures, the electrocautery group had 4 patients positive for C acnes, and the scalpel group had 6 (P = .491). All positive cultures were exclusively from male patients. There were no wound complications or infection in the electrocautery group while the scalpel group had 1 acute postoperative infection.

CONCLUSIONS:

Making skin incisions using electrocautery resulted in 0 C acnes culture at the incised dermis, suggesting its potential effect against C acnes. However, despite this initial antibacterial effect, C acnes still appeared on surgeon's gloves and forceps during surgery of male patients. All positive cultures were from male patients, suggesting that the source of C acnes was specifically related to the male body. While the study hypothesis was supported by the results, the present study also raises new questions and calls for further research.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shoulder Joint / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Shoulder Joint / Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Humans / Male Language: En Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article