Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of pronated foot on energetic behavior and efficiency during walking.
Kawakami, Wataru; Iwamoto, Yoshitaka; Sekiya, Junpei; Ota, Mitsuhiro; Ishii, Yosuke; Takahashi, Makoto.
Affiliation
  • Kawakami W; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Iwamoto Y; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; Center for Advanced Practice and Research of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Sekiya J; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Ota M; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Ishii Y; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; Center for Advanced Practice and Research of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Takahashi M; Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; Center for Advanced Practice and Research of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan. Electronic address: biomec@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.
Gait Posture ; 107: 23-27, 2024 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37717290
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The longitudinal arch of the foot acts like a spring during stance and contributes to walking efficiency. Pronated foot characterized by a collapsed medial longitudinal arch may have the impaired spring-like function and poor walking efficiency. However, the differences in the energetic behavior during walking between individuals with pronated foot and neutral foot have not been considered. RESEARCH QUESTION How does the energetic behavior within the foot and proximal lower limb joints in pronated foot affect walking efficiency?

METHODS:

Twenty-one healthy young adults were classified into neutral foot and pronated foot based on the Foot Posture Index score. All subjects walked across the floor and attempted to have the rearfoot and forefoot segments contact separate force plates to analyze the forces acting on isolated regions within the foot. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded by a three-dimensional motion capture system. The hip, knee, ankle, and mid-tarsal joint power was quantified using a 6-degree-of-freedom joint power method. To qualify total power within all structures of the foot and forefoot, we used a unified deformable segment analysis. Additionally, we calculated the center of mass power to quantify the total power of the whole body

RESULTS:

There is no difference in the mid-tarsal joint work between the pronated foot and neutral foot. On the other hand, pronated foot exhibited greater net negative work at structures distal to the forefoot during walking. Additionally, pronated foot exhibited less net positive work at the ankle and center of mass during walking compared to neutral foot.

SIGNIFICANCE:

Individuals with pronated foot generate the mid-tarsal joint work by increasing the work absorbed at structures distal to the forefoot, which results in reduced energy efficiency during walking. That energy inefficiency may reduce positive work at the ankle and affect the walking efficiency in individuals with pronated foot.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Walking / Foot Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Walking / Foot Limits: Adult / Humans Language: En Journal: Gait Posture Journal subject: ORTOPEDIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan