Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The intracortical excitability changes underlying the enhancing effects of rewards and punishments on motor performance.
Hamel, R; Pearson, J; Sifi, L; Patel, D; Hinder, M R; Jenkinson, N; Galea, J M.
Affiliation
  • Hamel R; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom; School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: r.hamel@bham.ac.uk.
  • Pearson J; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
  • Sifi L; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
  • Patel D; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
  • Hinder MR; School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Jenkinson N; School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
  • Galea JM; School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Brain Stimul ; 16(5): 1462-1475, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37777109
ABSTRACT
Monetary rewards and punishments enhance motor performance and are associated with corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases within the motor cortex (M1) during movement preparation. However, such CSE changes have unclear origins. Based on converging evidence, one possibility is that they stem from increased glutamatergic (GLUTergic) facilitation and/or decreased type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA)-mediated inhibition within M1. To investigate this, paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used over the left M1 to evaluate intracortical facilitation (ICF) and short intracortical inhibition (SICI), indirect assays of GLUTergic activity and GABAA-mediated inhibition, in an index finger muscle during the preparation of sequences initiated by either the right index or little finger. Behaviourally, rewards and punishments enhanced both reaction and movement time. During movement preparation, regardless of rewards or punishments, ICF increased when the index finger initiated sequences, whereas SICI decreased when both the index and little fingers initiated sequences. This finding suggests that GLUTergic activity increases in a finger-specific manner whilst GABAA-mediated inhibition decreases in a finger-unspecific manner during preparation. In parallel, both rewards and punishments non-specifically increased ICF, but only rewards non-specifically decreased SICI as compared to neutral. This suggests that to enhance performance rewards both increase GLUTergic activity and decrease GABAA-mediated inhibition, whereas punishments selectively increase GLUTergic activity. A control experiment revealed that such changes were not observed post-movement as participants processed reward and punishment feedback, indicating they were selective to movement preparation. Collectively, these results map the intracortical excitability changes in M1 by which incentives enhance motor performance.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Punishment / Evoked Potentials, Motor Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Punishment / Evoked Potentials, Motor Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Brain Stimul Journal subject: CEREBRO Year: 2023 Type: Article