Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The routes of hysterectomy: A survey of current practices amongst members of the International Society for Gynaecologic Endoscopy (ISGE).
Djokovic, D; Noé, G; van Herendael, Bruno J; Chrysostomou, A.
Affiliation
  • Djokovic D; Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central (CHULC), Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. Electronic address: dusan.djokovic@nms.unl.pt.
  • Noé G; University of Witten Herdecke, Witten, Germany; Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rheinland Clinics, Dormagen, Germany.
  • van Herendael BJ; Department of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Stuivenberg General Hospital, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen (ZNA), Antwerp, Belgium; Università degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
  • Chrysostomou A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Urogynaecology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 291: 99-105, 2023 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37857149
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the current opinion on the routes of hysterectomy amongst the members of the International Society for Gynaecologic Endoscopy (ISGE), as well as the perceptions of potential barriers that inhibit gynaecologists from offering a minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIHs) to their patients. STUDY DESIGN: An anonymous, electronic survey was designed, including the questions about the surgeon location and length of gynaecological practice, preferred approach to hysterectomy, approximate number of surgical cases performed during the year preceding the survey (2021), and potential barriers and contraindications to performing MIHs. It was validated by 12 practicing gynaecologists. Subsequently, the survey was sent to all practicing gynaecologists who are the members of the ISGE. RESULTS: We received a response from 159 members of ISGE (29 % response rate), of which 92 % with ≥ 5 years in practice since the completion of their residency training in Gynaecology and Obstetrics. When asked about the preferred route of hysterectomy for themselves or their relatives, 59 % chose total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), 19 % vaginal hysterectomy (VH), 8 % chose laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and 5 % chose total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). However, TAH was the most performed hysterectomy procedure undertaken by the respondents in the year preceding the survey. When asked about the main obstacles to performing MIHs, more than half of the respondents highlighted insufficient training during residency and insufficient surgical experience. Only 25 % of the responders acknowledged reading the ISGE guidelines on performing vaginal hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to a full understanding of the benefits of MIHs, lack of training, as well as insufficient surgical experience and unawareness of existing evidence-based guidelines were the main reasons for the high rate of TAH among the ISGE members who participated in the study. All efforts should be directed at teaching VH and TLH techniques during residency, continuous acquisition of practical experience, and use of validated patient selection guidelines for MIH in daily clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Gynecology Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Laparoscopy / Gynecology Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Year: 2023 Type: Article