Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recombinant or Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Adults under 65 Years of Age.
Hsiao, Amber; Yee, Arnold; Fireman, Bruce; Hansen, John; Lewis, Ned; Klein, Nicola P.
Affiliation
  • Hsiao A; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
  • Yee A; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
  • Fireman B; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
  • Hansen J; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
  • Lewis N; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
  • Klein NP; From the Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA.
N Engl J Med ; 389(24): 2245-2255, 2023 Dec 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091531
BACKGROUND: Quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccines contain three times the amount of hemagglutinin protein as standard-dose egg-based vaccines, and the recombinant formulation is not susceptible to antigenic drift during manufacturing. Data are needed on the relative effectiveness of recombinant vaccines as compared with standard-dose vaccines against influenza-related outcomes in adults under the age of 65 years. METHODS: In this cluster-randomized observational study, Kaiser Permanente Northern California facilities routinely administered either a high-dose recombinant influenza vaccine (Flublok Quadrivalent) or one of two standard-dose influenza vaccines during the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons to adults 50 to 64 years of age (primary age group) and 18 to 49 years of age. Each facility alternated weekly between the two vaccine formulations. The primary outcome was influenza (A or B) confirmed by polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) testing. Secondary outcomes included influenza A, influenza B, and influenza-related hospitalization outcomes. We used Cox regression analysis to estimate the hazard ratio of the recombinant vaccine as compared with the standard-dose vaccines against each outcome. We calculated the relative vaccine effectiveness as 1 minus the hazard ratio. RESULTS: The study population included 1,630,328 vaccinees between the ages of 18 and 64 years (632,962 in the recombinant-vaccine group and 997,366 in the standard-dose group). During this study period, 1386 cases of PCR-confirmed influenza were diagnosed in the recombinant-vaccine group and 2435 cases in the standard-dose group. Among the participants who were 50 to 64 years of age, 559 participants (2.00 cases per 1000) tested positive for influenza in the recombinant-vaccine group as compared with 925 participants (2.34 cases per 1000) in the standard-dose group (relative vaccine effectiveness, 15.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9 to 23.8; P = 0.002). In the same age group, the relative vaccine effectiveness against influenza A was 15.7% (95% CI, 6.0 to 24.5; P = 0.002). The recombinant vaccine was not significantly more protective against influenza-related hospitalization than were the standard-dose vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: The high-dose recombinant vaccine conferred more protection against PCR-confirmed influenza than an egg-based standard-dose vaccine among adults between the ages of 50 and 64 years. (Funded by Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03694392.).
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines, Synthetic / Vaccines, Combined / Influenza, Human Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: N Engl J Med Year: 2023 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines, Synthetic / Vaccines, Combined / Influenza, Human Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: N Engl J Med Year: 2023 Type: Article