Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of prone position on dead-space fraction in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Théry, Guillaume; Scemama, Astrée; Roblin, Elvire; Caplan, Morgan; Mourvillier, Bruno; Goury, Antoine.
Affiliation
  • Théry G; Intensive Care Unit, Reims Hospital University, Reims, France. guillaume.d.thery@gmail.com.
  • Scemama A; Intensive Care Unit, Reims Hospital University, Reims, France.
  • Roblin E; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy, Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France.
  • Caplan M; Intensive Care Unit, Reims Hospital University, Reims, France.
  • Mourvillier B; Intensive Care Unit, Reims Hospital University, Reims, France.
  • Goury A; Intensive Care Unit, Reims Hospital University, Reims, France.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 17, 2024 Jan 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183063
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

COVID-19 Related Acute Respiratory Syndrome (C-ARDS) is characterized by a mismatch between respiratory mechanics and hypoxemia, suggesting increased dead-space fraction (DSF). Prone position is a cornerstone treatment of ARDS under invasive mechanical ventilation reducing mortality. We sought to investigate the impact of prone position on DSF in C-ARDS in a cohort of patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

METHODS:

we retrospectively analysed data from 85 invasively mechanically ventilated patients with C-ARDS in supine and in prone positions, hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit (Reims University Hospital), between November, 1st 2020 and November, 1st 2022. DSF was estimated via 3 formulas usable at patients' bedside, based on partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2).

RESULTS:

there was no difference of DSF between supine and prone position, using the 3 formulas. According to Enghoff, Frankenfield and Gattinoni equations, DSF in supine vs. prone position was in median respectively [IQR] 0.29 [0.13-0.45] vs. 0.31 [0.19-0.51] (p = 0.37), 0.5 [0.48-0.52] vs. 0.51 [0.49-0.53] (p = 0.43), and 0.71 [0.55-0.87] vs. 0.69 [0.57-0.81], (p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION:

prone position did not change DSF in C-ARDS.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: BMC Pulm Med Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: France