Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Linked-color imaging with or without artificial intelligence for adenoma detection: a randomized trial.
Miyaguchi, Kazuya; Tsuzuki, Yoshikazu; Hirooka, Nobutaka; Matsumoto, Hisashi; Ohgo, Hideki; Nakamoto, Hidetomo; Imaeda, Hiroyuki.
Affiliation
  • Miyaguchi K; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Tsuzuki Y; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Hirooka N; Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Matsumoto H; Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Ohgo H; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Nakamoto H; Department of General Internal Medicine, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
  • Imaeda H; Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
Endoscopy ; 56(5): 376-383, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191000
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important indicator of colonoscopy quality and colorectal cancer incidence. Both linked-color imaging (LCI) with artificial intelligence (LCA) and LCI alone increase adenoma detection during colonoscopy, although it remains unclear whether one modality is superior. This study compared ADR between LCA and LCI alone, including according to endoscopists' experience (experts and trainees) and polyp size.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing colonoscopy for positive fecal immunochemical tests, follow-up of colon polyps, and abdominal symptoms at a single institution were randomly assigned to the LCA or LCI group. ADR, adenoma per colonoscopy (APC), cecal intubation time, withdrawal time, number of adenomas per location, and adenoma size were compared.

RESULTS:

The LCA (n=400) and LCI (n=400) groups showed comparable cecal intubation and withdrawal times. The LCA group showed a significantly higher ADR (58.8% vs. 43.5%; P<0.001) and mean (95%CI) APC (1.31 [1.15 to 1.47] vs. 0.94 [0.80 to 1.07]; P<0.001), particularly in the ascending colon (0.30 [0.24 to 0.36] vs. 0.20 [0.15 to 0.25]; P=0.02). Total number of nonpolypoid-type adenomas was also significantly higher in the LCA group (0.15 [0.09 to 0.20] vs. 0.08 [0.05 to 0.10]; P=0.02). Small polyps (≤5, 6-9mm) were detected significantly more frequently in the LCA group (0.75 [0.64 to 0.86] vs. 0.48 [0.40 to 0.57], P<0.001 and 0.34 [0.26 to 0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.18 to 0.29], P=0.04, respectively). In both groups, ADR was not significantly different between experts and trainees.

CONCLUSIONS:

LCA was significantly superior to LCI alone in terms of ADR.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence / Adenoma / Colonic Polyps / Colonoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence / Adenoma / Colonic Polyps / Colonoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Endoscopy Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan