Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of genotypic HIV DNA testing: a DELPHI-type consensus.
Andre-Garnier, Elisabeth; Bocket, Laurence; Bourlet, Thomas; Hocqueloux, Laurent; Lepiller, Quentin; Maillard, Anne; Reigadas, Sandrine; Barriere, Guillaume; Durand, François; Montes, Brigitte; Stefic, Karl; Marcelin, Anne-Geneviève.
Affiliation
  • Andre-Garnier E; Virology Department, University Hospital Nantes, CIC 1413 Nantes, France.
  • Bocket L; Virology Department, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France.
  • Bourlet T; Infectious Agents and Hygiene Department, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
  • Hocqueloux L; Infectious and Tropical Diseases Department, University Hospital Orléans, Orléans, France.
  • Lepiller Q; Virology Department, University Hospital Besançon, Besançon, France.
  • Maillard A; Virology Department, University Hospital Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Reigadas S; Gilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Barriere G; Gilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Durand F; Gilead Sciences S.A.S., Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
  • Montes B; Virology Department, University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Stefic K; Bacteriology, Virology and Hospital Hygene Department, University of Tours, INSERM U1259 MAVIVH, University Hospital Tours, Tours, France.
  • Marcelin AG; Virology Departement, Sorbonne University, INSERM, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, AP-HP, University Hospitals Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, 83, Boulevard de l'hôpital, Paris 75013, France.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 79(3): 578-588, 2024 03 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38269616
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

As many disparities in the clinical use of HIV DNA sequencing are observed, a DELPHI-type consensus was initiated in France to homogenize use, techniques and interpretation of results.

METHODS:

Based on a literature review and clinical experience, a steering committee (SC) of eight virologists and one infectious disease specialist formulated statements. Statements were submitted to an independent and anonymous electronic vote of virologists and HIV clinicians in France, between October 2022 and December 2022.

RESULTS:

The SC developed 20 statements grouped into six categories clinical situations for the use of HIV DNA genotyping; techniques for performing HIV DNA genotyping; consideration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme (APOBEC) mutations; genotyping results reporting; recycling of antiretrovirals; and availability of HIV DNA genotyping tests and delays. Twenty-one virologists and 47 clinicians participated in two voting rounds and 18/20 (90%) assertions reached a 'strong' consensus. For example, that prior genotyping on HIV DNA is useful for clinical decision-making when considering switching to some long-acting regimens or to reduce the number of antiretroviral agents in virologically suppressed patients for whom RNA data are unavailable/not exploitable/not sufficiently informative. Two statements achieved no consensus reporting any detected viral minority population for discussion in multidisciplinary meetings (virologists), and possible risk of virological failure when using a second-generation InSTI plus lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in patients with undetectable viral load within ≥1 year and in the presence of a documented M184V mutation within the last 5 years (clinicians).

CONCLUSIONS:

This DELPHI-type consensus will facilitate the strengthening and harmonization of good practice when performing HIV DNA sequencing.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Anti-HIV Agents Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: France

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Anti-HIV Agents Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: France