Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gender distribution in publishing in five leading optometry journals.
Cardona, Genis; Herrera, Aitor.
Affiliation
  • Cardona G; Applied Optics and Image Processing Group (GOAPI), School of Optics and Optometry of Terrassa, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Terrassa, Spain.
  • Herrera A; School of Optics and Optometry of Terrassa, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Terrassa, Spain.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(3): 634-640, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321803
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To explore gender distribution in authorship and citation parameters of articles published in five optometry journals included in the Ophthalmology category of Journal Citation Reports.

METHODS:

The Scopus database was used to retrieve all citable articles published in 2011 and 2021 in Optometry and Vision Science, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Clinical Experimental Optometry, Contact Lens and Anterior Eye, and Eye and Contact Lens. Gender of the first, last and single authors of all articles, and citation parameters of articles published in 2011 up to May 2023 were determined. Gender of the editor-in-chief and members of the editorial board of these journals was investigated (May 2023).

RESULTS:

Only one journal had a female editor-in-chief and three journals had more males than females in their editorial board. In 2011 and 2021, respectively, 40.1% and 48.0% of articles had female as the first authors ( χ 1 , 948 2 = 5.77; p = 0.02), and 32.7% and 39.6% had female as the last authors ( χ 1 , 948 2 = 4.61; p = 0.03). Gender parity was observed in one journal for the first author and none for the last author in 2011, and in three journals for the first author and one for the last author in 2021. Regarding combinations of male (M) and female (F) first and last authorship positions, the authors of articles in 2011 were MM (44.5%), FM (22.8%), FF (17.3%) and MF (15.4%), and MM (34.6%), FM (25.8%), FF (22.1%) and MF (17.5%) in 2021. Differences between 2011 and 2021 were statistically significant ( χ 3 , 948 2 = 9.80; p = 0.02). The proportion of authorship combinations did not show statistically significant differences among journals in 2011 or in 2021. Neither citation nor self-citation were influenced by gender.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gender disparities persist in optometry journals, with females being under-represented in senior and leadership positions. Increasing the awareness of gender disparity in authorship is a necessary step towards ensuring fairness in science in general, and optometry in particular.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Optometry / Periodicals as Topic Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Spain

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Optometry / Periodicals as Topic Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Spain