Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How Does a Junior Faculty Development Program Affect Burnout? A Mixed Methods Assessment.
Riley, Timothy D; Parascando, Jessica A; VanDyke, Erika; Stuckey, Heather L; Dong, Huamei; Pasha-Razzak, Omrana; Kass, Lawrence E; McCall-Hosenfeld, Jennifer; Bronson, Sarah K.
Affiliation
  • Riley TD; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Parascando JA; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • VanDyke E; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Stuckey HL; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Humanities and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Dong H; Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Pasha-Razzak O; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Kass LE; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • McCall-Hosenfeld J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
  • Bronson SK; Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 11: 23821205231223294, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38322705
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Burnout is common among junior faculty. Professional development has been proposed as a method to improve engagement and reduce burnout among academic physicians. The Penn State College of Medicine Junior Faculty Development Program (JFDP) is a well-established, interdisciplinary program. However, an increase in burnout was noted among participants during the program. The authors sought to quantify the change in burnout seen among JFDP participants across 3 cohorts, and to explore sources of well-being and burnout among participants.

METHODS:

Through a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach, participants in the 2018/19, 2019/20, and 2020/21 cohorts took a survey assessing burnout (Copenhagen Burnout Inventory), quality of life (QoL), job satisfaction, and work-home conflict at the start and end of the course. Descriptive statistics were generated as well as Pearson χ2 test/Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables for group comparisons. To better understand the outcome, past participants were invited to interviews regarding their experience of burnout during the course. Inductive thematic analysis (kappa = 0.86) was used to derive themes.

RESULTS:

Start- and end-of-course surveys were completed by 84 and 75 participants, respectively (response rates 95.5% and 85.2%). Burnout associated with patient/learner/client/colleague increased (P = .005) and QoL decreased (P = .02) at the end compared with the start. Nonsignificant trends toward worsening in other burnout categories, work-home conflict, and job satisfaction were also observed. Nineteen interviews yielded themes related to risks and protective factors for burnout including competing demands, benefits of networking, professional growth, and challenges related to diverse faculty roles.

CONCLUSION:

Junior Faculty Development Program participants demonstrated worsening of burnout and QoL during the program while benefiting from opportunities including skill building and networking. The impact of Junior Faculty Development Programs on the well-being of participants should be considered as an element of their design, evaluation, and refinement over time.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States