Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world effectiveness of voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir in patients following DAA failure.
Graf, Christiana; D'Ambrosio, Roberta; Degasperi, Elisabetta; Paolucci, Stefania; Llaneras, Jordi; Vermehren, Johannes; Dultz, Georg; Peiffer, Kai-Henrik; Finkelmeier, Fabian; Herrmann, Eva; Zeuzem, Stefan; Buti, Maria; Lampertico, Pietro; Dietz, Julia; Sarrazin, Christoph.
Affiliation
  • Graf C; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • D'Ambrosio R; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Degasperi E; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Paolucci S; Microbiology and Virology Department, Foundation IRCCS San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
  • Llaneras J; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine of the UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Spain.
  • Vermehren J; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Dultz G; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Peiffer KH; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Finkelmeier F; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Herrmann E; Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Zeuzem S; Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Buti M; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), External Partner Site Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Lampertico P; Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Department of Medicine of the UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona), Spain.
  • Dietz J; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Sarrazin C; CRC A.M. e A. Migliavacca Center of Liver Diseases, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
JHEP Rep ; 6(3): 100994, 2024 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357421
ABSTRACT
Background &

Aims:

Voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) is highly effective for re-treatment of direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-experienced patients with chronic HCV infection. In the present study, predictors of virologic treatment response were analyzed in an integrative analysis of three large real-world cohorts.

Methods:

Consecutive patients re-treated with VOX/VEL/SOF after DAA failure were enrolled between 2016 and 2021 in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and Switzerland.

Results:

A total of 746 patients were included median age was 56 (16-88) years and 77% were male. Most patients were infected with HCV genotype 1 (56%) and 3 (32%). 86% of patients carried resistance-associated substitutions in the NS3, NS5A or NS5B regions. Overall, 95.4% (683/716) of patients achieved a sustained virologic response. Treatment effectiveness was significantly affected by advanced liver disease (p <0.001), hepatocellular carcinoma (p <0.001), higher baseline ALT levels (p = 0.02), HCV genotype 3 (p <0.001), and prior VEL/SOF treatment (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, only HCV genotype 3, hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis turned out to be independent predictors of treatment failure. Resistance-associated substitutions, as well as the presence of rare genotypes, did not impact treatment outcome. The effectiveness of rescue therapy with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and SOF, with or without ribavirin, for 12 to 24 weeks was found to be high (100%).

Conclusions:

Infection with HCV genotype 3, the presence of liver cancer and cirrhosis are independently associated with failure of VOX/VEL/SOF re-treatment. It is unclear whether the addition of ribavirin and/or extension of treatment duration may be effective to avoid virologic relapse on VOX/VEL/SOF. However, rescue treatment with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF seems to be effective. Impact and implications Representative data on the effectiveness of voxilaprevir/velpatasvir/sofosbuvir (VOX/VEL/SOF) in clinical practice are still scarce and the collection of a larger number of patients with difficult-to-treat cofactors including the assessment of resistance-associated substitution profiles is required before more specific recommendations for optimal re-treatment in these patients can be given. Thus, we aimed to analyze treatment effectiveness and predictors of virologic response to VOX/VEL/SOF in an integrative analysis of three large real-word cohorts. The study results, derived from a multicenter cohort consisting of 746 patients, demonstrated that re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF is an effective salvage therapy associated with an overall per protocol sustained virologic response rate of 95%. Hepatocellular carcinoma onset, cirrhosis and HCV genotype 3 were identified as independent negative predictors of treatment response, whereas resistance-associated substitutions, as well as rare genotypes and chimera, did not impact sustained virologic response rates following re-treatment with VOX/VEL/SOF.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JHEP Rep Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JHEP Rep Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany