Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Environmental assessment of diets: overview and guidance on indicator choice.
Ran, Ylva; Cederberg, Christel; Jonell, Malin; Bergman, Kristina; De Boer, Imke J M; Einarsson, Rasmus; Karlsson, Johan; Potter, Hanna Karlsson; Martin, Michael; Metson, Geneviève S; Nemecek, Thomas; Nicholas, Kimberly A; Strand, Åsa; Tidåker, Pernilla; Van der Werf, Hayo; Vanham, Davy; Van Zanten, Hannah H E; Verones, Francesca; Röös, Elin.
Affiliation
  • Ran Y; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: ylva.ran@slu.se.
  • Cederberg C; Division of Physical Resource Theory, Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Jonell M; Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Science, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Bergman K; KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • De Boer IJM; Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
  • Einarsson R; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Karlsson J; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Potter HK; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Martin M; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Metson GS; Department of Geography and Environment, Social Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada; Ecological and Environmental Modeling Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Nemecek T; Agroscope, Life Cycle Assessment Research Group, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Nicholas KA; Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden.
  • Strand Å; IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Tidåker P; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Van der Werf H; French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment, l'Institut Agro Rennes-Angers, Rennes, France.
  • Vanham D; Ispra, Italy.
  • Van Zanten HHE; Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen Universityand Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Department of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  • Verones F; Industrial Ecology Programme, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Röös E; Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lancet Planet Health ; 8(3): e172-e187, 2024 03.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453383
ABSTRACT
Comprehensive but interpretable assessment of the environmental performance of diets involves choosing a set of appropriate indicators. Current knowledge and data gaps on the origin of dietary foodstuffs restrict use of indicators relying on site-specific information. This Personal View summarises commonly used indicators for assessing the environmental performance of diets, briefly outlines their benefits and drawbacks, and provides recommendations on indicator choices for actors across multiple fields involved in activities that include the environmental assessment of diets. We then provide recommendations on indicator choices for actors across multiple fields involved in activities that use environmental assessments, such as health and nutrition experts, policy makers, decision makers, and private-sector and public-sector sustainability officers. We recommend that environmental assessment of diets should include indicators for at least the five following areas climate change, biosphere integrity, blue water consumption, novel entities, and impacts on natural resources (especially wild fish stocks), to capture important environmental trade-offs. If more indicators can be handled in the assessment, indicators to capture impacts related to land use quantity and quality and green water consumption should be used. For ambitious assessments, indicators related to biogeochemical flows, stratospheric ozone depletion, and energy use can be added.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diet Language: En Journal: Lancet Planet Health Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Diet Language: En Journal: Lancet Planet Health Year: 2024 Type: Article