Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of left ventricle regional myocardial motion for cardiac radioablation: Left ventricular motion analysis.
Poon, Justin; Thompson, Richard B; Deyell, Marc W; Schellenberg, Devin; Clark, Haley; Reinsberg, Stefan; Thomas, Steven.
Affiliation
  • Poon J; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Thompson RB; Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Deyell MW; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Schellenberg D; Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Clark H; Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Reinsberg S; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Thomas S; Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(5): e14333, 2024 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493500
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Left ventricle (LV) regional myocardial displacement due to cardiac motion was assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine images to establish region-specific margins for cardiac radioablation treatments.

METHODS:

CMR breath-hold cine images and LV myocardial tissue contour points were analyzed for 200 subjects, including controls (n = 50) and heart failure (HF) patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 50), mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, n = 50), and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, n = 50). Contour points were divided into segments according to the 17-segment model. For each patient, contour point displacements were determined for the long-axis (all 17 segments) and short-axis (segments 1-12) directions. Mean overall, tangential (longitudinal or circumferential), and normal (radial) displacements were calculated for the 17 segments and for each segment level.

RESULTS:

The greatest overall motion was observed in the control group-long axis 4.5 ± 1.2 mm (segment 13 [apical anterior] epicardium) to 13.8 ± 3.0 mm (segment 6 [basal anterolateral] endocardium), short axis 4.3 ± 0.8 mm (segment 9 [mid inferoseptal] epicardium) to 11.5 ± 2.3 mm (segment 1 [basal anterior] endocardium). HF patients exhibited lesser motion, with the smallest overall displacements observed in the HFrEF group-long axis 4.3 ± 1.7 mm (segment 13 [apical anterior] epicardium) to 10.6 ± 3.4 mm (segment 6 [basal anterolateral] endocardium), short axis 3.9 ± 1.3 mm (segment 8 [mid anteroseptal] epicardium) to 7.4 ± 2.8 mm (segment 1 [basal anterior] endocardium).

CONCLUSIONS:

This analysis provides an estimate of epicardial and endocardial displacement for the 17 segments of the LV for patients with normal and impaired LV function. This reference data can be used to establish treatment planning margin guidelines for cardiac radioablation. Smaller margins may be used for patients with higher degree of impaired heart function, depending on the LV segment.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / Heart Failure / Heart Ventricles Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Journal subject: BIOFISICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / Heart Failure / Heart Ventricles Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Journal subject: BIOFISICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Canada