Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pragmatic Approach to In Situ Simulation to Identify Latent Safety Threats Before Moving to a Newly Built ICU.
Sarwal, Aarti; Morris, Nicholas A; Crumpler, Janet; Gordon, Terri; Saunders, Ian; Johnson, James E; Carter, Jeff E.
Affiliation
  • Sarwal A; Department of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Morris NA; Department of Neurology, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Crumpler J; Neurocritical Care Unit, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Gordon T; Neurocritical Care Unit, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC.
  • Saunders I; Center of Experiential and Applied Learning, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
  • Johnson JE; Center for Experiential and Applied Learning, Simulation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC.
  • Carter JE; University Medical Center Burn Center, New Orleans, LA.
Crit Care Med ; 52(7): e351-e364, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38535489
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Transitions to new care environments may have unexpected consequences that threaten patient safety. We undertook a quality improvement project using in situ simulation to learn the new patient care environment and expose latent safety threats before transitioning patients to a newly built adult ICU.

DESIGN:

Descriptive review of a patient safety initiative.

SETTING:

A newly built 24-bed neurocritical care unit at a tertiary care academic medical center.

SUBJECTS:

Care providers working in neurocritical care unit.

INTERVENTIONS:

We implemented a pragmatic three-stage in situ simulation program to learn a new patient care environment, transitioning patients from an open bay unit to a newly built private room-based ICU. The project tested the safety and efficiency of new workflows created by new patient- and family-centric features of the unit. We used standardized patients and high-fidelity mannequins to simulate patient scenarios, with "test" patients created through all electronic databases. Relevant personnel from clinical and nonclinical services participated in simulations and/or observed scenarios. We held a debriefing after each stage and scenario to identify safety threats and other concerns. Additional feedback was obtained via a written survey sent to all participants. We prospectively surveyed for missed latent safety threats for 2 years following the simulation and fixed issues as they arose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

We identified and addressed 70 latent safety threats, including issues concerning physical environment, infection prevention, patient workflow, and informatics before the move into the new unit. We also developed an orientation manual that highlighted new physical and functional features of the ICU and best practices gleaned from the simulations. All participants agreed or strongly agreed that simulations were beneficial. Two-year follow-up revealed only two missed latent safety threats.

CONCLUSIONS:

In situ simulation effectively identifies latent safety threats surrounding the transition to new ICUs and should be considered before moving into new units.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Safety / Intensive Care Units Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Crit Care Med Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Caledonia

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Safety / Intensive Care Units Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Crit Care Med Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: New Caledonia