Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anti-epileptic drug use during adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is associated with poorer survival in patients with glioblastoma: A nationwide population-based cohort study.
Lee, Peng-Yi; Wei, Yu-Ting; Chao, Kun-San Clifford; Chu, Chin-Nan; Chung, Wen-Hui; Wang, Ti-Hao.
Affiliation
  • Lee PY; Department of Radiation Oncology, Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, No. 542, Section 1 CHUNG-SHAN Road, Changhua, Taiwan.
  • Wei YT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Lin Shin Hospital, No. 36, Section 3 Huizhong Road, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chao KC; Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin, Taiwan.
  • Chu CN; Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chung WH; Division of Family Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Wang TH; Division of Occupational Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 20(2): 555-562, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687925
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There are emerging but inconsistent evidences about anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) as radio- or chemo-sensitizers to improve survival in glioblastoma patients. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to evaluate the impact of concurrent AED during post-operative chemo-radiotherapy on outcome. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A total of 1057 glioblastoma patients were identified by National Health Insurance Research Database and Cancer Registry in 2008-2015. Eligible criteria included those receiving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and without other cancer diagnoses. Survival between patients taking concurrent AED for 14 days or more during chemo-radiotherapy (AED group) and those who did not (non-AED group) were compared, and subgroup analyses for those with valproic acid (VPA), levetiracetam (LEV), or phenytoin were performed. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors.

RESULTS:

There were 642 patients in the AED group, whereas 415 in the non-AED group. The demographic data was balanced except trend of more patients in the AED group had previous drug history of AEDs (22.6% vs. 18%, P 0.078). Overall, the AED group had significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.18, P 0.016) compared to the non-AED group. Besides, an adverse dose-dependent relationship on survival was also demonstrated in the AED group (HR = 1.118, P 0.0003). In subgroup analyses, the significant detrimental effect was demonstrated in VPA group (HR = 1.29,P 0.0002), but not in LEV (HR = 1.18, P 0.079) and phenytoin (HR = 0.98, P 0.862).

CONCLUSIONS:

Improved survival was not observed in patients with concurrent AEDs during chemo-radiotherapy. Our real-world data did not support prophylactic use of AEDs for glioblastoma patients.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma / Anticonvulsants Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma / Anticonvulsants Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Cancer Res Ther Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Taiwan