Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning to predict notes for chart review in the oncology setting: a proof of concept strategy for improving clinician note-writing.
Jiang, Sharon; Lam, Barbara D; Agrawal, Monica; Shen, Shannon; Kurtzman, Nicholas; Horng, Steven; Karger, David R; Sontag, David.
Affiliation
  • Jiang S; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Lam BD; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Agrawal M; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
  • Shen S; Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
  • Kurtzman N; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Horng S; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Karger DR; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
  • Sontag D; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 31(7): 1578-1582, 2024 Jun 20.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700253
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Leverage electronic health record (EHR) audit logs to develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts which notes a clinician wants to review when seeing oncology patients. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We trained logistic regression models using note metadata and a Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) text representation. We evaluated performance with precision, recall, F1, AUC, and a clinical qualitative assessment.

RESULTS:

The metadata only model achieved an AUC 0.930 and the metadata and TF-IDF model an AUC 0.937. Qualitative assessment revealed a need for better text representation and to further customize predictions for the user.

DISCUSSION:

Our model effectively surfaces the top 10 notes a clinician wants to review when seeing an oncology patient. Further studies can characterize different types of clinician users and better tailor the task for different care settings.

CONCLUSION:

EHR audit logs can provide important relevance data for training ML models that assist with note-writing in the oncology setting.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electronic Health Records / Machine Learning / Medical Oncology Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Electronic Health Records / Machine Learning / Medical Oncology Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Journal subject: INFORMATICA MEDICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States