Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Outcomes of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses implantation]. / Rezul'tat implantatsii intraokulyarnykh linz s rasshirennoi glubinoi fokusa.
Pershin, K B; Pashinova, N F; Tsygankov, A Yu; Antonov, E A; Kosova, I V; Korneeva, E A.
Affiliation
  • Pershin KB; Excimer Eye Centre, Moscow, Russia.
  • Pashinova NF; Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
  • Tsygankov AY; Excimer Eye Centre, Moscow, Russia.
  • Antonov EA; Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia.
  • Kosova IV; Excimer Eye Centre, Moscow, Russia.
  • Korneeva EA; Excimer Eye Centre, Moscow, Russia.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 140(2): 40-46, 2024.
Article in Ru | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742497
ABSTRACT
Extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) are the latest IOL designs. In recent years, several models of EDOF IOLs have become available in Russia, two of which (Tecnis Symfony and Acrysof IQ Vivity) are implanted in our clinic. Comparative studies devoted to the results of implantation of the new EDOF IOLs are rare in the available literature.

PURPOSE:

This article compares the outcomes of implantation of two EDOF IOLs in patients with presbyopia and/or cataract. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

The prospective study included 60 patients (81 eyes) after implantation of EDOF IOL Tecnis Symfony (32 patients, 45 eyes; group 1) or EDOF IOL AcrySof IQ Vivity (28 patients, 36 eyes; group 2). The mean follow-up period was 3.9±1.3 months.

RESULTS:

All groups showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), intermediate visual acuity (UCIVA), and distance visual acuity (UCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time compared to preoperative values. In group 1, the best corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA) increased from 0.61±0.10 to 0.82±0.16 at the maximum follow-up time, and in group 2 - from 0.58±0.08 to 0.67±0.12 (p>0.05). Both groups showed a significant increase in best corrected intermediate and distance visual acuity (BCIVA and BCDVA) at the maximum follow-up time. The increase in the indicator compared to the preoperative period was not significant in both groups (p>0.05). The frequency of side optical phenomena was low in both groups. No significant differences were found between the groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

This study presents a comparative analysis of the results of implantation of two different EDOF IOLs. Both lenses were comparable in most of the studied parameters, including providing good distance and intermediate vision, functional near vision, as well as a low frequency of side optical phenomena. In all cases the patients were satisfied with the results of the surgical intervention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Presbyopia / Visual Acuity / Lens Implantation, Intraocular / Lenses, Intraocular Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia / Europa Language: Ru Journal: Vestn Oftalmol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: RUSSIA

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Presbyopia / Visual Acuity / Lens Implantation, Intraocular / Lenses, Intraocular Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia / Europa Language: Ru Journal: Vestn Oftalmol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: RUSSIA