Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Image-Guided Energy Ablation for Palliation of Painful Bony Metastases-A Systematic Review.
Yao, Patrick F; Hu, Angela; Mansour, Fadi; Nadeem, Ibrahim; Jiang, Yixin; Athreya, Sriharsha.
Affiliation
  • Yao PF; Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: patrick.yao@medportal.ca.
  • Hu A; Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mansour F; Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nadeem I; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jiang Y; Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Athreya S; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Niagara Health System, St. Catherines General Site, St. Catherines, Ontario, Canada.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 2024 May 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38815751
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To analyze the effectiveness of image-guided energy ablation techniques with and without concurrent therapies in providing palliative pain relief in patients with bone metastases. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, and Pubmed were searched from inception to April 14, 2023, using search terms related to bone lesions and MeSH terms regarding ablation therapy. English peer-reviewed primary articles were included that reported pain scores following image-guided energy-based ablation of bone metastases. Exclusion criteria included nonpalliative treatment, pain scores associated with specific treatment modalities not reported, and nonmetastatic bone lesions. Mean percentage reduction in pain score was calculated.

RESULTS:

Of the 1,396 studies screened, 54 were included. All but 1 study demonstrated decreased pain scores at final follow-up. Mean reductions in pain scores at final follow-up were 49% for radiofrequency (RF) ablation, 58% for RF ablation and adjunct, 54% for cryoablation (CA), 72% for cryoablation and adjunct (CA-A), 48% for microwave ablation (MWA), 81% for microwave ablation and adjunct (MWA-A), and 64% for high-intensity focused ultrasound (US). Postprocedural adverse event rates were 4.9% for RF ablation, 34.8% for RF ablation and adjunct, 9.6% for CA, 12.0% for CA-A, 48.9% for MWA, 33.5% for MWA-A, and 17.0% for high-intensity focused US.

CONCLUSIONS:

Image-guided energy ablation demonstrated consistently strong reduction in pain across all modalities, with variable postprocedural adverse event rates. Owing to heterogeneity of included studies, quantitative analysis was not appropriate. Future primary research should focus on creating consistent prospective studies with established statistical power, explicit documentation, and comparison with other techniques.

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Journal subject: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article