Prehospital neurologic assessment using mobile phones: Comparison between neurologists and emergency physicians.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ambulance-based telestroke may be a promising solution to improving stroke care. We assessed the technical feasibility and reliability of prehospital evaluations using commercial mobile phones with fifth-generation wireless communication technology. METHODS: Six standardized patients portrayed scripted stroke scenarios during ambulance transport in an urban city and were remotely evaluated by independent raters using tablets (three neurologists and three emergency physicians) in a hospital, assisted by paramedics (trained in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] assessment) in the ambulance; commercial cellular networks were utilized for videoconferencing transmission. The primary outcomes were mean difference (MD) and correlation of NIHSS scores between the face-to-face and remote assessments. We also examined the Bland-Altman plot for itemized NIHSS components, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the differences in the duration of the two evaluations between neurologists and emergency physicians. RESULTS: We conducted 32 ambulance runs and successfully completed all NIHSS examinations. No significant difference was found between the face-to-face and remote evaluations (MD, 0.782; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.520-0.395). The correlation of NIHSS scores between the two methods was 0.994 (95% CI, 0.945-1.026), and three items exhibited the highest frequency of runs, with score differences between the two methods. There were no significant differences between neurologists and emergency physicians in the mean evaluation duration and NIHSS scores for the two methods. CONCLUSION: Prehospital evaluation using commercial mobile phones with fifth-generation wireless communication technology is feasible and reliable during ambulance transport in urban areas. Emergency physicians and neurologists performed similarly in stroke evaluations.