Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and feasibility of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) prior to surgical resection for pancreatic cancer.
Sugawara, Shunsuke; Sone, Miyuki; Umino, Ryosuke; Ban, Daisuke; Itou, Chihiro; Kimura, Shintaro; Oshima, Takumi; Ozawa, Mizuki; Tanishima, Tomoya; Nakama, Rakuhei; Murakami, Sho; Kusumoto, Masahiko; Mizui, Takahiro; Takamoto, Takeshi; Nara, Satoshi; Esaki, Minoru.
Affiliation
  • Sugawara S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. shsugawa@ncc.go.jp.
  • Sone M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Umino R; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Ban D; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Itou C; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Kimura S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Oshima T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Ozawa M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Tanishima T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Nakama R; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Murakami S; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Kusumoto M; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Mizui T; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Takamoto T; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Nara S; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
  • Esaki M; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(12): 4365-4372, 2024 Dec.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39120716
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, diagnostic yield, and technical aspects of percutaneous abdominal lavage cytology screening (PACS) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS:

This single-center, retrospective study included patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent PACS before pancreatectomy between May 2022 and October 2023. The technical success rate, position of the drainage tube, volume of fluid administered, volume of fluid retrieved, fluid retrieval rate, and adverse events were evaluated. The cytological results of PACS were compared with those of surgical peritoneal lavage performed during pancreatectomy.

RESULTS:

Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. The technical success rate for PACS was 100%. Drainage tube placement was outside the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the right-sided abdominal approach group (n = 10), whereas the placement was in the pouch of Douglas in all patients in the suprapubic approach group (n = 34). The mean volume of fluid administered, mean volume of fluid retrieved, and fluid retrieval rate were 185.0 ± 22.9 ml vs. 97.1 ± 32.0 ml (p < 0.001), 36.8 ± 25.6 ml vs. 50.5 ± 21.6 ml (p = 0.059), and 19.0 ± 12.4% vs. 54.9 ± 21.9% (p < 0.001) in the right abdominal approach and suprapubic approach groups, respectively. No adverse events were reported. The cytological results were benign in 42 patients; no discrepancy was observed in the results of surgical peritoneal lavage (n = 36).

CONCLUSION:

PACS is a feasible and safe procedure that can be performed before pancreatectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. the suprapubic approach may be ideal and PACS could be a screening method to detect carcinomatous peritonitis.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Feasibility Studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Feasibility Studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Japan