Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical Assessment of Liver Integrity: Prospective Evaluation of Mechanical Versus Acoustic MR Elastography.
Koch, Vitali; Gotta, Jennifer; Chernyak, Victoria; Cengiz, Duygu; Torgashov, Katerina; Eichler, Katrin; Vilgrain, Valérie; Martin, Simon S; Ziegengeist, Nicole S; Konrad, Paul; Booz, Christian; Yel, Ibrahim; D'Angelo, Tommaso; Mahmoudi, Scherwin; Scholtz, Jan-Erik; Bernatz, Simon; Alizadeh, Leona S; Cimprich, Marina; Solim, Levent A; Thalhammer, Axel; Gruber-Rouh, Tatjana; Hammerstingl, Renate M; Zeuzem, Stefan; Finkelmeier, Fabian; Pathil-Warth, Anita; Onay, Melis; Kinzler, Maximilian N; Darwish, Omar; Annio, Giacomo; Taylor, Stuart A; Wild, Peter; Dahmer, Iulia; Herrmann, Eva; Almansour, Haidara; Vogl, Thomas J; Gruenewald, Leon D; Sinkus, Ralph.
Affiliation
  • Koch V; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Gotta J; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Chernyak V; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA.
  • Cengiz D; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Torgashov K; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Eichler K; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Vilgrain V; Laboratory of Imaging Biomarkers, Center for Research on Inflammation, UMR 1149 INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Martin SS; Department of Radiology, Beaujon University Hospital Paris Nord, AP-HP, Clichy, France.
  • Ziegengeist NS; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Konrad P; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Booz C; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Yel I; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • D'Angelo T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Mahmoudi S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Scholtz JE; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Bernatz S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Alizadeh LS; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Cimprich M; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Solim LA; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Thalhammer A; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Gruber-Rouh T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Hammerstingl RM; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Zeuzem S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Finkelmeier F; Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Pathil-Warth A; Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Onay M; Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Kinzler MN; Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Darwish O; Department of Internal Medicine I, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Annio G; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Taylor SA; Laboratory of Translational Vascular Sciences, U1148, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
  • Wild P; Radiology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Dahmer I; Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Herrmann E; Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Almansour H; Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modeling, Faculty of Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Vogl TJ; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  • Gruenewald LD; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Sinkus R; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 2024 Aug 21.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165139
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) can quantify tissue biomechanics noninvasively, including pathological hepatic states like metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis.

PURPOSE:

To compare the performance of 2D/3D-MRE using the gravitational (GT) transducer concept with the current commercial acoustic (AC) solution utilizing a 2D-MRE approach. Additionally, quality index markers (QIs) were proposed to identify image pixels with sufficient quality for reliably estimating tissue biomechanics. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION One hundred seventy participants with suspected or confirmed liver disease (median age, 57 years [interquartile range (IQR), 46-65]; 66 females), and 11 healthy volunteers (median age, 31 years [IQR, 27-34]; 5 females). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE Participants were scanned twice at 1.5 T and 60 Hz vibration frequency first, using AC-MRE (2D-MRE, spin-echo EPI sequence, 11 seconds breath-hold), and second, using GT-MRE (2D- and 3D-MRE, gradient-echo sequence, 14 seconds breath-hold). ASSESSMENT Image analysis was performed by four independent radiologists and one biomedical engineer. Additionally, superimposed analytic plane shear waves of known wavelength and attenuation at fixed shear modulus were used to propose pertinent QIs. STATISTICAL TESTS Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) was applied to assess the correlation between modalities. Interreader reproducibility was evaluated using Bland-Altman bias and reproducibility coefficients. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

Liver stiffness quantified via GT-2D/3D correlated well with AC-2D (r ≥ 0.89 [95% CI 0.85-0.92]) and histopathological grading (r ≥ 0.84 [95% CI 0.72-0.91]), demonstrating excellent agreement in Bland-Altman plots and between readers (κ ≥ 0.86 [95% CI 0.81-0.91]). However, GT-2D showed a bias in overestimating stiffness compared to GT-3D. Proposed QIs enabled the identification of pixels deviating beyond 10% from true stiffness based on a combination of total wave amplitude, temporal sinusoidal nonlinearity, and wave signal-to-noise ratio for GT-3D.

CONCLUSION:

GT-MRE represents an alternative to AC-MRE for noninvasive liver tissue characterization. Both GT-2D and 3D approaches correlated strongly with the established commercial approach, offering advanced capabilities in abdominal imaging compared to AC-MRE. EVIDENCE LEVEL 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY Stage 2.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Germany