Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early versus Delayed Timing of Primary Repair after Open-Globe Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
McMaster, David; Bapty, James; Bush, Lana; Serra, Giuseppe; Kempapidis, Theo; McClellan, Scott F; Woreta, Fasika A; Justin, Grant A; Agrawal, Rupesh; Hoskin, Annette K; Cavuoto, Kara; Leong, James; Ascarza, Andrés Rousselot; Cason, John; Miller, Kyle E; Caldwell, Matthew C; Gensheimer, William G; Williamson, Tom H; Dhawahir-Scala, Felipe; Shah, Peter; Coombes, Andrew; Sundar, Gangadhara; Mazzoli, Robert A; Woodcock, Malcolm; Watson, Stephanie L; Kuhn, Ferenc; Colyer, Marcus; Gomes, Renata S M; Blanch, Richard J.
Affiliation
  • McMaster D; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Bapty J; Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
  • Bush L; Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Serra G; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; Northern Hub for Veterans and Military Families Research, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
  • Kempapidis T; BRAVO VICTOR, London, United Kingdom.
  • McClellan SF; Vision Center of Excellence, Research & Development Directorate (J-9), Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland.
  • Woreta FA; Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Justin GA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Ophthalmology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Agrawal R; National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Republic of Singapore; Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
  • Hoskin AK; Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
  • Cavuoto K; Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
  • Leong J; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Ascarza AR; Universidad del Salvador, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Cason J; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Miller KE; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Department of Ophthalmology, Navy Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia.
  • Caldwell MC; Department of Ophthalmology, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Gensheimer WG; White River Junction Veterans Administration Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Williamson TH; Department of Engineering and Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, Surrey, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Dhawahir-Scala F; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
  • Shah P; Birmingham Institute for Glaucoma Research, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  • Coombes A; Department of Ophthalmology, The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
  • Sundar G; Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore.
  • Mazzoli RA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Woodcock M; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom.
  • Watson SL; Save Sight Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Kuhn F; Helen Keller Foundation for Research and Education, Birmingham, Alabama; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
  • Colyer M; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Gomes RSM; Northern Hub for Veterans and Military Families Research, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom; BRAVO VICTOR, London, United Kingdom.
  • Blanch RJ; Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for
Ophthalmology ; 2024 Aug 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218161
ABSTRACT
TOPIC The timing of primary repair of open-globe injury is variable in major trauma centers worldwide, and consensus on optimal timing is lacking. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Surgery is the mainstay of open-globe injury management, and appropriate timing of surgical repair may minimize the risk of potentially blinding complications such as endophthalmitis, thereby optimizing visual outcomes.

METHODS:

A systematic literature review was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews identifier, CRD42023442972). The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and ISRCTN registries and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception through October 29, 2023. Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized studies of patients with open-globe injury with a minimum of 1 month of follow-up after primary repair were included. Primary outcomes included visual acuity at last follow-up and the proportion of patients with endophthalmitis. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS:

Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, reporting a total of 8497 eyes. The most common injury types were penetrating and intraocular foreign body (IOFB). Meta-analysis found that primary repair less than 24 hours after open-globe injury was associated with 0.30 odds of endophthalmitis compared with primary repair conducted more than 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.79; I2 = 95%; P = 0.01). No significant difference was found in reported visual outcomes between patients whose open-globe injuries were repaired more than, compared with less than, 24 hours after trauma (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.61-1.29; I2 = 70%; P = 0.52). All included studies were retrospective and nonrandomized, demonstrating an overall low certainty of evidence on GRADE assessment.

DISCUSSION:

Only retrospective data exist around the effect of timing of open-globe repair, resulting in low certainty of the available evidence. However, this review of current evidence, predominantly including penetrating and IOFB injuries, suggests that primary repair performed less than 24 hours after open-globe injury is associated with a reduced endophthalmitis rate compared with longer delays, consistent with delay to primary repair increasing endophthalmitis risk. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S) Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Key words

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Ophthalmology Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom