Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-utility analysis of methylphenidate treatment for children and adolescents with ADHD in Brazil
Maia, Carlos R; Stella, Steffan F; Wagner, Flavia; Pianca, Thiago G; Krieger, Fernanda V; Cruz, Luciane N; Polanczyk, Guilherme V; Rohde, Luís A; Polanczyk, Carísi A.
Afiliación
  • Maia, Carlos R; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Stella, Steffan F; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Wagner, Flavia; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Pianca, Thiago G; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Krieger, Fernanda V; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Cruz, Luciane N; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Polanczyk, Guilherme V; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Rohde, Luís A; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
  • Polanczyk, Carísi A; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Porto Alegre. BR
Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) ; 38(1): 30-38, Jan.-Mar. 2016. tab, graf
Article en En | LILACS | ID: lil-776499
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To perform a cost-utility analysis on the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with methylphenidate immediate-release (MPH-IR) in children and adolescents from Brazil.

Method:

A Markov model was constructed to compare MPH-IR vs. no treatment. A 24-week naturalistic study was conducted to collect transition probabilities and utility data. Effectiveness was expressed as quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and costs reported in 2014 international dollars (I$). The perspective was the Brazilian Unified Health System as payer, and the time horizon was 6 years.

Results:

Of 171 patients, 73 provided information at baseline, and 56 at week 24. Considering the MPH-IR monthly cost of I$ 38, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was I$ 9,103/QALY for children and I$ 11,883/QALY for adolescents. In two-way sensitivity analysis, considering one Gross National Product per capita (I$ 11,530) as willingness-to-pay, a cost of no-treatment lower than I$ 45/month would render MPH-IR a cost-saving strategy.

Discussion:

MPH-IR treatment of children and adolescents is cost-effective for ADHD patients from the Brazilian public health system perspective. Both patients and the healthcare system might benefit from such a strategy. Trial registration number NCT01705613.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: LILACS Asunto principal: Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central / Metilfenidato Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: LILACS Asunto principal: Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central / Metilfenidato Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Psychiatry (São Paulo, 1999, Impr.) Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil