Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ETCare: a randomized, controlled, masked trial comparing two solutions for upper airway care in the NICU.
Christensen, R D; Rigby, G; Schmutz, N; Lambert, D K; Wiedmeier, S E; Burnett, J; Scoffield, S H; Muelleck, R; Snow, K; Woodhead, D D; Snow, G L.
Afiliación
  • Christensen RD; Neonatal Intensive Care, McKay-Dee Hospital Center, Intermountain Healthcare, Ogden, UT 84403, USA. rdchris@ihc.com
J Perinatol ; 27(8): 479-84, 2007 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17568755
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Small quantities of normal saline are sometimes instilled into the endotracheal tube of intubated neonates, to assist with the removal of thick secretions and maintain patency of the endotracheal tube. However, saline is detrimental to the innate immune system of the upper airway mucosa, rapidly unfolding and inactivating antimicrobial peptides such as LL-37. We previously reported the preparation and feasibility testing of 'ETCare', a low-sodium, physiologically based solution for airway care, and we now report results of a randomized, masked, controlled, two-centered study testing ETCare vs sterile saline among 60 intubated NICU patients. STUDY

DESIGN:

Sixty intubated NICU patients were randomized to having their airway care with ETCare vs saline. Three hypotheses were tested (1) tolerance - patients will tolerate ETCare for airway care as well as they tolerate saline, (2) nosocomial infections - ETCare will result in fewer tracheal aspirates where organisms grow and fewer cases of nosocomial sepsis, and (3) chronic lung disuse - ETCare will result in fewer patients discharged home on supplemental O2.

RESULTS:

Thirty NICU patients with an endotracheal tube in place were randomized to receive their airway care with ETCare, and 30 to receive their care with saline. Only the pharmacist was aware of the randomization; the two solutions were visually indistinguishable and were dispensed in identical syringes. Tolerance of the solutions was similar. The ETCare recipients had trends toward fewer positive blood cultures (odds ratios (OR), 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.13 to 1.68), and fewer discharges home on supplemental O2 (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.14 to 1.32; P=0.075).

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of this study and our previous 10-patient feasibility trial, we maintain that, for airway care, intubated NICU patients tolerate ETCare as well as saline. Data from this study can be used in estimating the sample sizes needed for a phase III trial. We speculate that such a trial will demonstrate that, compared with saline, ETCare will result in fewer nosocomial infections and less chronic lung disease.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Soluciones / Cloruro de Sodio / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Intubación Intratraqueal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Soluciones / Cloruro de Sodio / Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal / Intubación Intratraqueal Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos