Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defibrillation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation first for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests found by paramedics to be in ventricular fibrillation? A randomised control trial.
Baker, Paul W; Conway, Jane; Cotton, Chris; Ashby, Dale T; Smyth, James; Woodman, Richard J; Grantham, Hugh.
Afiliación
  • Baker PW; South Australian Ambulance Service, 216 Greenhill Road, Eastwood, South Australia 5063, Australia. baker.paul@saambulance.com.au
Resuscitation ; 79(3): 424-31, 2008 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18986748
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To determine whether in patients with an ambulance response time of >5min who were in VF cardiac arrest, 3min of CPR before the first defibrillation was more effective than immediate defibrillation in improving survival to hospital discharge.

METHODS:

This randomised control trial was run by the South Australian Ambulance Service between 1 July, 2005, and 31 July, 2007. Patients in VF arrest were eligible for randomisation. Exclusion criteria were (i) <18 years of age, (ii) traumatic arrest, (iii) paramedic witnessed arrest, (iv) advanced life support performed before arrival of paramedics and (v) not for resuscitation order or similar directive. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge with secondary outcomes being neurological status at discharge, the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and the time from first defibrillation to ROSC.

RESULTS:

For all response times, no differences were observed between the immediate defibrillation group and the CPR first group in survival to hospital discharge (17.1% [18/105] vs. 10.3% [10/97]; P=0.16), the rate of ROSC (53.3% [56/105] vs. 50.5% [49/97]; P=0.69) or the time from the first defibrillation to ROSC (1237 vs. 1119; P=0.49). There were also no differences between the immediate defibrillation group and the CPR first group, for response times of < or = or > 5min survival to hospital discharge (50.0% [7/14] vs. 25.0% [4/16]; P=0.16 or 12.1% [11/91] vs.7.4% [6/81]; P=0.31, respectively) and the rate of ROSC (71.4% [10/14] vs. 75.0% [12/16]; P=0.83 or 50.5% [46/91] vs. 45.7% [37/81]; P=0.54, respectively). No differences were observed in the neurological status of those surviving to hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION:

For patient in out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest we found no evidence to support the use of 3min of CPR before the first defibrillation over the accepted practice of immediate defibrillation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Reanimación Cardiopulmonar / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Paro Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Resuscitation Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fibrilación Ventricular / Cardioversión Eléctrica / Reanimación Cardiopulmonar / Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Paro Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Resuscitation Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia