[Opinion-forming difficulties in establishing paternity resulting from the lack of data on the relationship between biological and putative father]. / Trudnosci opiniodawcze w ustalaniu ojcostwa spowodowane brakiem informacji o pokrewienstwie biologicznego i domniemanego ojca.
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol
; 61(1): 65-9, 2011.
Article
en Pl
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-22117492
Among a large number of expert opinions concerning disputed paternity cases prepared in the Chair of Forensic Medicine and Medico-Legal Toxicology, Silesian University of Medicine, Katowice, there were those in which the use of a standard 15 autosomal loci AmpFISTR Identifiler kit was not sufficient to give an unequivocal opinion. The authors report a case of disputed paternity, in which the analysis done by applying an AmpFISTR Identifiler kit showed no paternity heredity in 2 loci in the child. As allele distribution did not exclude mutation, further genetic markers were determined using PowerPlex ESX and FFFL kits and further three exclusions were found. Moreover, X-chromosome loci were determined using a MentypeAngusX8 test, which confirmed the exclusion of paternity in further 4 loci.
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Paternidad
/
Polimorfismo Genético
/
ADN
/
Dermatoglifia del ADN
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Newborn
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
Pl
Revista:
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol
Año:
2011
Tipo del documento:
Article