What evidence supports special processing for faces? A cautionary tale for fMRI interpretation.
J Cogn Neurosci
; 25(11): 1777-93, 2013 Nov.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-23859648
ABSTRACT
We trained a neurocomputational model on six categories of photographic images that were used in a previous fMRI study of object and face processing. Multivariate pattern analyses of the activations elicited in the object-encoding layer of the model yielded results consistent with two previous, contradictory fMRI studies. Findings from one of the studies [Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science, 293, 2425-2430, 2001] were interpreted as evidence for the object-form topography model. Findings from the other study [Spiridon, M., & Kanwisher, N. How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study. Neuron, 35, 1157-1165, 2002] were interpreted as evidence for neural processing mechanisms in the fusiform face area that are specialized for faces. Because the model contains no special processing mechanism or specialized architecture for faces and yet it can reproduce the fMRI findings used to support the claim that there are specialized face-processing neurons, we argue that these fMRI results do not actually support that claim. Results from our neurocomputational model therefore constitute a cautionary tale for the interpretation of fMRI data.
Texto completo:
1
Bases de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Percepción Visual
/
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
/
Cara
Tipo de estudio:
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Cogn Neurosci
Asunto de la revista:
NEUROLOGIA
Año:
2013
Tipo del documento:
Article