The use of alternative preference elicitation methods in complex discrete choice experiments.
J Health Econ
; 32(6): 1166-79, 2013 Dec.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-24144729
ABSTRACT
We analyse stated preference data over nursing jobs collected from two different discrete choice experiments a multi-profile case best-worst scaling experiment (BWS) prompting selection of the best and worst among alternative jobs, and a profile case BWS wherein the respondents choose the best and worst job attributes. The latter allows identification of additional utility parameters and is believed to be cognitively easier. Results suggest that respondents place greater value on pecuniary over non-pecuniary gains in the multi-profile case. There is little evidence that this discrepancy is induced by the extra cognitive burden of processing several profiles at once in the multi-profile case. We offer thoughts on other likely mechanisms.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Bases de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Estudiantes de Enfermería
/
Conducta de Elección
/
Satisfacción en el Trabajo
/
Modelos Teóricos
Tipo de estudio:
Observational_studies
Límite:
Humans
País/Región como asunto:
Oceania
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Health Econ
Asunto de la revista:
HOSPITAIS
/
SERVICOS DE SAUDE
Año:
2013
Tipo del documento:
Article