Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Budget impact analysis of a fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) in a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) for asthma.
Dunlop, William; Heron, Louise; Fox, Georgia; Greaney, Maire.
Afiliación
  • Dunlop W; Mundipharma International Limited, Unit 194 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 0GW, UK, will.dunlop@mundipharma.co.uk.
Adv Ther ; 30(10): 933-44, 2013 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24194361
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The economic burden of asthma on the UK National Health Service (NHS) is the largest among allergic diseases. Current asthma guidelines recommend adding a long acting ß2-agonist (LABA) to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in patients who are on ICS monotherapy and have uncontrolled asthma. The fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate (FP/SAL), available in a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) device, is the most commonly prescribed ICS/LABA combination. An additional fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) in pMDI is now available. In a 12-week non-inferiority study, FP/FORM demonstrated comparable efficacy to FP/SAL. The present analysis estimates the annual budget impact for the UK NHS using FP/FORM as an alternative to FP/SAL.

METHODS:

Current pMDI prescribing data were from a real-world UK patient database (Cegedim Strategic Data). Annual costs to the NHS for drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring were estimated for FP/FORM and FP/SAL and used to assess the potential budget impact for the NHS for the use of FP/FORM instead of FP/SAL. Varying rates of uptake, adherence, adverse event-related costs, and resource use associated with switching treatment were assessed in scenario analyses.

RESULTS:

Assuming similar levels of ICS use with both regimens, annual drug acquisition costs per person were lower with FP/FORM (£412) than with FP/SAL (£509). The difference in acquisition costs and otherwise comparable input costs between the treatments, results in potential annual savings of £15,110,279 to the NHS, assuming uptake of FP/FORM over FP/SAL in 50% of existing patients. The introduction of FP/FORM results in cost savings for the NHS in all of the assessed scenario analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

The comparable efficacy and lower acquisition costs of FP/FORM compared with FP/SAL make it a cost-saving option for the UK NHS for the treatment of asthma patients requiring combination maintenance therapy using a pMDI.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Medicina Estatal / Costos de los Medicamentos / Antiasmáticos / Etanolaminas / Androstadienos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Asunto de la revista: TERAPEUTICA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Asma / Medicina Estatal / Costos de los Medicamentos / Antiasmáticos / Etanolaminas / Androstadienos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Adv Ther Asunto de la revista: TERAPEUTICA Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article