Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electronic couplings for molecular charge transfer: benchmarking CDFT, FODFT, and FODFTB against high-level ab initio calculations.
Kubas, Adam; Hoffmann, Felix; Heck, Alexander; Oberhofer, Harald; Elstner, Marcus; Blumberger, Jochen.
Afiliación
  • Kubas A; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
  • Hoffmann F; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
  • Heck A; Institute of Physical Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Fritz-Haber-Weg 6, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Oberhofer H; Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85747 Garching, Germany.
  • Elstner M; Institute of Physical Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Fritz-Haber-Weg 6, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
  • Blumberger J; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom.
J Chem Phys ; 140(10): 104105, 2014 Mar 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24628150
ABSTRACT
We introduce a database (HAB11) of electronic coupling matrix elements (H(ab)) for electron transfer in 11 π-conjugated organic homo-dimer cations. High-level ab inito calculations at the multireference configuration interaction MRCI+Q level of theory, n-electron valence state perturbation theory NEVPT2, and (spin-component scaled) approximate coupled cluster model (SCS)-CC2 are reported for this database to assess the performance of three DFT methods of decreasing computational cost, including constrained density functional theory (CDFT), fragment-orbital DFT (FODFT), and self-consistent charge density functional tight-binding (FODFTB). We find that the CDFT approach in combination with a modified PBE functional containing 50% Hartree-Fock exchange gives best results for absolute H(ab) values (mean relative unsigned error = 5.3%) and exponential distance decay constants ß (4.3%). CDFT in combination with pure PBE overestimates couplings by 38.7% due to a too diffuse excess charge distribution, whereas the economic FODFT and highly cost-effective FODFTB methods underestimate couplings by 37.6% and 42.4%, respectively, due to neglect of interaction between donor and acceptor. The errors are systematic, however, and can be significantly reduced by applying a uniform scaling factor for each method. Applications to dimers outside the database, specifically rotated thiophene dimers and larger acenes up to pentacene, suggests that the same scaling procedure significantly improves the FODFT and FODFTB results for larger π-conjugated systems relevant to organic semiconductors and DNA.

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chem Phys Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Chem Phys Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido