Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-reported outcomes, body composition, and nutrition status in patients with head and neck cancer: Results from an exploratory randomized controlled exercise trial.
Capozzi, Lauren C; McNeely, Margaret L; Lau, Harold Y; Reimer, Raylene A; Giese-Davis, Janine; Fung, Tak S; Culos-Reed, S Nicole.
Afiliación
  • Capozzi LC; Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • McNeely ML; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta and Cross Cancer Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Lau HY; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Reimer RA; Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Giese-Davis J; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Fung TS; Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Culos-Reed SN; Department of Psychosocial Resources, Tom Baker Cancer Center, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cancer ; 122(8): 1185-200, 2016 Apr 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26828426
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with head and neck cancer experience loss of weight and muscle mass, decreased functioning, malnutrition, depression, and declines in quality of life during and after treatment. The purpose of this exploratory randomized study was to determine the optimal timing for the initiation of a lifestyle and progressive resistance exercise training intervention (during or after radiation therapy), as determined by intervention adherence and by comparing between-group outcomes across 24 weeks.

METHODS:

Sixty patients with head and neck cancer were randomized to engage in a 12-week lifestyle intervention and progressive resistance-training program either during radiation treatment or immediately after completion. The primary outcome of body composition--specifically, lean body mass, body mass index, and body fat--as well as secondary outcomes of fitness, quality of life, depression, and nutrition status were evaluated.

RESULTS:

The progressive resistance-training intervention carried out during treatment did not significantly influence the primary outcome of body composition, despite a significant increase in weekly physical activity reported by the intervention group. A small-to-medium intervention effect was noted for some secondary outcomes, including fitness, quality of life, and nutrition status. Regardless of whether patients received the immediate or delayed progressive resistance-training intervention, the analysis revealed a main effect of time on body composition, fitness, quality of life, depression, and nutritional scores.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although the intervention during treatment did not reduce the loss of lean body mass, delaying the exercise program until after treatment completion was associated with improved intervention adherence, a finding with important clinical implications.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Composición Corporal / Terapia por Ejercicio / Autoinforme / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Composición Corporal / Terapia por Ejercicio / Autoinforme / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá