Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrathoracic extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: assessment of the benefit of thoracic and brain radiotherapy using the SEER database.
Mahmoud, Omar; Kwon, Deukwoo; Greenfield, Brad; Wright, Jean L; Samuels, Michael A.
Afiliación
  • Mahmoud O; Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institue of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA. omar.mahmoud@rutgers.edu.
  • Kwon D; Biostatistics Core, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Greenfield B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Wright JL; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Samuels MA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 21(6): 1062-1070, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380168
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ESCLC) includes metastatic disease and locally advanced disease confined to the thorax that cannot be encompassed in a typical radiation portal. We assessed and then compared the benefits of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and/or brain radiotherapy (BRT) on overall survival (OS) between the intrathoracic (T-ESCLC) and metastatic (M-ESCLC) groups using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database.

METHODS:

TRT and BRT data were available for 10150 patients treated from 1988-1997. The T-ESCLC group included 1774 patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and the proportional hazards model was used to estimate OS hazard ratios for prognostic factors including age, gender, race, tumor size, T/N stage, TRT, and BRT.

RESULTS:

The 2-year OS for T-ESCLC was 7.8 % compared to 3 % in the M-ESCLC group (p < 0.001). In the T-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 750 and 102 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 13 % in the TRT group compared to 4.1 % in the no-TRT group (p ≤ 0.001) and 22.5 % in the BRT group compared to 7 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). In the M-ESCLC group, TRT and BRT were delivered to 3093 and 1887 patients, respectively. The 2-year OS was 4.4 % in the TRT group compared to 2.8 % in the no-TRT group (p < 0.001) and 4.3 % in the BRT compared to 2.6 % in the no-BRT group (p < 0.001). Age, gender, TRT and BRT were significant OS prognostic factors in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study suggests that T-ESCLC is a disease entity distinct from M-ESCLC. Prospective studies to determine whether TRT should be recommended for the thoracic-only subgroup are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos