[Rigid cystoscopy versus retrovision for adjustable peri-urethral balloons guidance: Comparison of precision thanks to a surgical navigation system]. / Cystoscopie rigide versus rétro-vision pour le guidage des ballonnets péri-urétraux : comparaison de la précision grâce à un système de navigation chirurgicale.
Prog Urol
; 26(10): 566-72, 2016 Sep.
Article
en Fr
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-27473788
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
The main goal of our phantom study was to compare the precision of adjustable periurethral balloons positioning depending whether the guidance was obtained by retrovision or rigid cystoscopy. MATERIAL ANDMETHODS:
A navigation guidance system was used to localize the introduction mandrel which was equipped with tracking targets. Two ideal sites of implantation were predefined and recorded into the navigation system. The two points were placed symmetrically to the phantom reproducing the urethra. Four different users were asked to position the tip of the introduction mandrel as close as possible to the ideal site of implantation with the help of each method of guidance. For each attempt, the distance (mm) between the tip of the introduction mandrel and the ideal position was recorded by the navigation system.RESULTS:
For each method of guidance, a total of 20 attempts on each side were made by direct puncture on one side and a symmetrical contralateral puncture. For direct puncture, the median distances were 5.20 (±3.96) and 4.38 (±1.55) mm with rigid cystoscopy and retrovision respectively (P=0.29). For symmetrical contralateral puncture, the median distance were 7,19 (±3,78) and 6,86 (±2,76) mm with rigid cystoscopy and retrovision respectively (P=0,32)CONCLUSION:
This study could not demonstrate any significant difference between the two guidance systems. Nevertheless, it showed that navigation guidance system could be used to compare the precision of surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Bases de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Uretra
/
Fantasmas de Imagen
/
Cistoscopía
Tipo de estudio:
Guideline
Idioma:
Fr
Revista:
Prog Urol
Asunto de la revista:
UROLOGIA
Año:
2016
Tipo del documento:
Article