Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of a pocket screening spirometer in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in general practice: a cross sectional validation study using tertiary care as a reference.
Labor, Marina; Vrbica, Zarko; Gudelj, Ivan; Labor, Slavica; Plavec, Davor.
Afiliación
  • Labor M; Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Center Osijek, Josipa Huttlera 4, Osijek, Croatia.
  • Vrbica Z; Faculty of Medicine, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Ulica cara Hadrijana 10E, Osijek, Croatia.
  • Gudelj I; Department of Pulmonology an Immunology, General Hospital Dubrovnik, Dr. Roka Misetica 2, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
  • Labor S; University of Dubrovnik, Branitelja Dubrovnika 29, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
  • Plavec D; Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital Center Split, Spinciceva 1, Split, Croatia.
BMC Fam Pract ; 17(1): 112, 2016 08 19.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27542843
BACKGROUND: COPD-6™ is a lung function testing device for a rapid pre-spirometry testing to screen-out at-risk individuals not having COPD and indicating those at risk. The aim of this study was to validate COPD-6™ lung function testing (index test) in general practice in discriminating patients with COPD out of the population at risk - smokers/ex-smokers with no previous diagnosis of COPD, using measurements at tertiary care as reference standard. METHODS: Consecutive 227 subjects (115 women, 185 smokers/42 ex-smokers, ≥20 pack-years) with no previous diagnosis of COPD, aged 52.5 (SD 6.8) years from 26 general practitioners (GPs) were recruited, lung function tested with COPD-6™, referred to the tertiary institution for repeated COPD-6™ testing followed by spirometry with a bronchodilator (salbutamol), examination, and pulmonologist consultation for the diagnosis and severity of COPD. RESULTS: COPD was diagnosed in 43 subjects (18.9 %), with an AUC of 0.827 (95 % CI 0.769-0.875, P < 0.001) for the diagnosis of COPD when lung function was measured using COPD-6™ in GP's office with a specificity of 100 % (95 % CI, 97.95-100 %) but a very low sensitivity of 32.56 % (95 % CI, 20.49-47.48 %). Significant agreement for forced expiratory volume in 1 s measured at GP's office and at lung function lab was found (mean difference 0.01 L, p = 0.667) but not for other measured parameters (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study results point out that active case finding in a population at risk for COPD should be instituted (almost 20 % of undiagnosed COPD). Based on our results lung function testing with COPD-6™ can substitute spirometry testing in cases where it is not readily available to the patient/physician taken into account that the traditional FEV1/FEV6 cutoff value of <0.7 is not the only criterion for diagnosis and/or further referral. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01550679 Registered 28 September 2014, retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espirometría / Tamizaje Masivo / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Medicina General Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Croacia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espirometría / Tamizaje Masivo / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica / Medicina General Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Fam Pract Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Croacia