Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critical dimensions of trans-sacral corridors assessed by 3D CT models: Relevance for implant positioning in fractures of the sacrum.
Wagner, Daniel; Kamer, Lukas; Sawaguchi, Takeshi; Geoff Richards, R; Noser, Hansrudi; Uesugi, Masafumi; Ossendorf, Christian; Rommens, Pol M.
Afiliación
  • Wagner D; AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Kamer L; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
  • Sawaguchi T; AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Geoff Richards R; Department of Orthopedics and Joint Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama Municipal Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
  • Noser H; AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Uesugi M; AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
  • Ossendorf C; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ibaraki Seinan Medical Center Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
  • Rommens PM; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
J Orthop Res ; 35(11): 2577-2584, 2017 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28247980
ABSTRACT
Trans-sacral implants can be used alternatively to sacro-iliac screws in the treatment of osteoporosis-associated fragility fractures of the pelvis and the sacrum. We investigated trans-sacral corridor dimensions, the number of individuals amenable to trans-sacral fixation, as well as the osseous boundaries and shape of the S1 corridor. 3D models were reconstructed from pelvic CT scans from 92 Europeans and 64 Japanese. A corridor of <12 mm was considered critical for trans-sacral implant positioning, and <8 mm as impossible. A statistical model of trans-sacral corridor S1 was computed. The limiting cranio-caudal diameter was 11.6 mm (±5.4) for S1 and 14 mm (±2.4) for S2. Trans-sacral implant positioning was critical in 52% of cases for S1, and in 21% for S2. The S1 corridor was impossible in 26%, with no impossible corridor in S2. Antero-superiorly, the S1 corridor was limited not only by the sacrum but in 40% by the iliac fossa. The statistical model demonstrated a consistent oval shape of the trans-section of corridor S1. Considering the variable in size and shape of trans-sacral corridors in S1, a thorough anatomical knowledge and preoperative planning are mandatory using trans-sacral implants. In critical cases, S2 is a veritable alternative. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 352577-2584, 2017.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sacro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sacro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Orthop Res Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza