Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Double-blind randomized phase III study comparing a mixture of natural agents versus placebo in the prevention of acute mucositis during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Marucci, Laura; Farneti, Alessia; Di Ridolfi, Paolo; Pinnaro, Paola; Pellini, Raul; Giannarelli, Diana; Vici, Patrizia; Conte, Mario; Landoni, Valeria; Sanguineti, Giuseppe.
Afiliación
  • Marucci L; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Farneti A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Ridolfi P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Pinnaro P; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Pellini R; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Giannarelli D; Department of Statistics, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Vici P; Department of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Conte M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Landoni V; Department of Physics, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Sanguineti G; Department of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Head Neck ; 39(9): 1761-1769, 2017 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560780
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is no widely accepted intervention in the prevention of acute mucositis during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck carcinoma. In the present double-blind study, we tested 4 natural agents, propolis, aloe vera, calendula, and chamomile versus placebo.

METHODS:

Patients undergoing concomitant chemo-intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were given natural agent or matched placebo; grade 3 mucositis on physical examination according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 was the primary endpoint. Various covariates were tested at logistic regression, including the individual amount of mucosa receiving at least 9.5 Gy per week (V9.5w).

RESULTS:

One hundred seven patients were randomized from January 2011 to July 2014, and 104 were assessable (51%-49% were assigned to the placebo group and 53%-51% were assigned to the natural agent). Overall, 61 patients developed peak grade 3 mucositis with no difference between arms (P = .65). Conversely, V9.5w (P = .007) and primary site (P = .037) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSION:

The selected natural agents do not prevent mucositis, whereas the role of V9.5w is confirmed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomatitis / Extractos Vegetales / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Quimioradioterapia / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Fitoterapia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estomatitis / Extractos Vegetales / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Quimioradioterapia / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Fitoterapia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Head Neck Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia