Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of liquid and gaseous calibration techniques for quantification of propofol in breath with sorbent tube Thermal Desorption System GC-MS.
Maurer, Felix; Geiger, Martin; Volk, Thomas; Sessler, Daniel I; Kreuer, Sascha.
Afiliación
  • Maurer F; CBR- Center of Breach Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66482 Homburg, Saar, Germany; The Center of Breath Research is part of the Outcomes Research, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic
  • Geiger M; CBR- Center of Breach Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66482 Homburg, Saar, Germany; The Center of Breath Research is part of the Outcomes Research, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Volk T; CBR- Center of Breach Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66482 Homburg, Saar, Germany; The Center of Breath Research is part of the Outcomes Research, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Sessler DI; Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; The Center of Breath Research is part of the Outcomes Research, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Kreuer S; CBR- Center of Breach Research, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, 66482 Homburg, Saar, Germany; The Center of Breath Research is part of the Outcomes Research, Cleveland, OH, USA.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 143: 116-122, 2017 Sep 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28586723
ABSTRACT
Plasma concentrations of intravenous drugs cannot currently be evaluated in real time to guide clinical dosing. However, a system for estimating plasma concentration of the anesthetic propofol from exhaled breath may soon be available. Developing reliable calibration and analytical validation techniques is thus necessary. We therefore compared the established sorbent tube liquid injection technique with a gas injection procedure using a reference gas generator. We then quantified propofol with Tenax sorbent tubes in combination with gas-chromatography coupled mass spectrometry in the breath of 15 patients (101 measurements). Over the clinically relevant concentration range from 10 to 50 ppbv, coefficient of determination was 0.995 for gas calibration; and over the range from 10 to 100ng, coefficient of determination was 0.996 for liquid calibration. A regression comparing gas to liquid calibration had a coefficient of determination of 0.89; slope 1.05±0.01 (standard deviation). The limit of detection was 0.74ng and the lower limit of quantification was 1.12ng for liquid; the limit of detection was 0.90 ppbv and the lower limit of quantification was 1.36 ppbv for gas. Loaded sorbent tubes were stable for at least 14days without significant propofol loss as determined with either method. Measurements from liquid or gas samples were comparably suitable for evaluation of patient breath samples.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Biomed Anal Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Propofol Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Pharm Biomed Anal Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article