Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of an interlaboratory comparison of analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars and biosugars in atmospheric aerosol.
Chiara Pietrogrande, M; Barbaro, Elena; Bove, M Chiara; Clauser, Giuseppe; Colombi, Cristina; Corbella, Lorenza; Cuccia, Eleonora; Dalla Torre, Stefano; Decesari, Stefano; Fermo, Paola; Gambaro, Andrea; Gianelle, Vorne; Ielpo, Pierina; Larcher, Roberto; Lazzeri, Paolo; Massabò, Dario; Melchionna, Gerardo; Nardin, Tiziana; Paglione, Marco; Perrino, Cinzia; Prati, Paolo; Visentin, Marco; Zanca, Nicola; Zangrando, Roberta.
Afiliación
  • Chiara Pietrogrande M; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17/19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: mpc@unife.it.
  • Barbaro E; Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics & Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venice Mestre, Italy.
  • Bove MC; Department of Physics & INFN, University of Genoa, Via Dodecaneso, 33, 16146 Genoa, Italy.
  • Clauser G; Agenzia Provinciale Protezione Ambiente, Via Lidorno 1, 38123 Trento, Italy.
  • Colombi C; ARPA Lombardia, Via I. Rosellini 17, 20124 Milan, Italy.
  • Corbella L; Department of Chemistry, University of Milan, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  • Cuccia E; ARPA Lombardia, Via I. Rosellini 17, 20124 Milan, Italy.
  • Dalla Torre S; National Research Council (CNR) Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research Rome, Via Salaria Km 29, 300, Monterotondo St., 00015, Rome, Italy.
  • Decesari S; National Research Council (CNR) Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy.
  • Fermo P; Department of Chemistry, University of Milan, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  • Gambaro A; Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics & Statistics, University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30170 Venice Mestre, Italy.
  • Gianelle V; ARPA Lombardia, Via I. Rosellini 17, 20124 Milan, Italy.
  • Ielpo P; National Research Council (CNR) Water Institute Research - CNR, Viale de Blasio 5, 70132 Bari, Italy.
  • Larcher R; Fondazione E. Mach, Technology Transfer Center, Via Edmund Mach 1, 38010 San Michele All'Adige (TN), Italy.
  • Lazzeri P; Agenzia Provinciale Protezione Ambiente, Via Lidorno 1, 38123 Trento, Italy.
  • Massabò D; Department of Physics & INFN, University of Genoa, Via Dodecaneso, 33, 16146 Genoa, Italy.
  • Melchionna G; ARPA Piemonte, Via Sabaudia 164, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
  • Nardin T; National Research Council (CNR) Water Institute Research - CNR, Viale de Blasio 5, 70132 Bari, Italy.
  • Paglione M; National Research Council (CNR) Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy.
  • Perrino C; National Research Council (CNR) Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research Rome, Via Salaria Km 29, 300, Monterotondo St., 00015, Rome, Italy.
  • Prati P; Department of Physics & INFN, University of Genoa, Via Dodecaneso, 33, 16146 Genoa, Italy.
  • Visentin M; Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 17/19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
  • Zanca N; National Research Council (CNR) Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (ISAC), Via Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy.
  • Zangrando R; Institute for the Dynamics of Environmental Processes-CNR, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venice-Mestre, Italy.
Chemosphere ; 184: 269-277, 2017 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28601009
ABSTRACT
An interlaboratory comparison was performed to evaluate the analytical methods for quantification of anhydrosugars - levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan - and biosugars - arabitol, glucose and mannitol - in atmospheric aerosol. The performance of 10 laboratories in Italy currently involved in such analyses was investigated on twenty-six PM (particulate matter) ambient filters, three synthetic PM filters and three aqueous standard solutions. An acceptable interlaboratory variability was found, determined as the mean relative standard deviation (RSD%) of the results from the participating laboratories, with the mean RSD% values ranging from 25% to 46% and decreasing with increasing sugar concentration. The investigated methods show good accuracy, evaluated as the percentage error (ε%) related to mean values, since method biases ranged within ±20% for most of the analytes measured in the different laboratories. The detailed investigation (ANOVA analysis at p < 0.05) of the contribution of each laboratory to the total variability and the measurement accuracy shows that comparable results are generated by the different methods, despite the great diversity in terms of extraction conditions, chromatographic separation - more recent LC (liquid chromatography) and EC (exchange chromatography) methods compared to more widespread GC (gas chromatography) - and detection systems, namely PAD (pulsed amperometric detection) or mass spectrometry.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espectrometría de Masas / Carbohidratos / Variaciones Dependientes del Observador / Monitoreo del Ambiente / Aerosoles / Contaminantes Atmosféricos País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Espectrometría de Masas / Carbohidratos / Variaciones Dependientes del Observador / Monitoreo del Ambiente / Aerosoles / Contaminantes Atmosféricos País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article